Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23176192›Full record

ReviewBMC bioinformatics2012

Knowledge-based analysis of proteomics data.

Marina Bessarabova, Alexander Ishkin, Lellean JeBailey, Tatiana Nikolskaya, Yuri Nikolsky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC bioinformatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exploratory proteomic characterization ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mesocorticolimbic and Cardiometabolic Diseases-Two Faces of the Same Coin?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Critical evaluation of the use of artificial data for machine learning basedComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marina BessarabovaThomson Reuters, IP & Science, 5901 Priestly Dr., #200, Carlsbad, CA 92008, USA.
Alexander Ishkin
Lellean JeBailey
Tatiana Nikolskaya
Yuri Nikolsky

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As it is the case with any OMICs technology, the value of proteomics data is defined by the degree of its functional interpretation in the context of phenotype. Functional analysis of proteomics profiles is inherently complex, as each of hundreds of detected proteins can belong to dozens of pathways, be connected in different context-specific groups by protein interactions and regulated by a variety of one-step and remote regulators. Knowledge-based approach deals with this complexity by creating a structured database of protein interactions, pathways and protein-disease associations from experimental literature and a set of statistical tools to compare the proteomics profiles with this rich source of accumulated knowledge. Here we describe the main methods of ontology enrichment, interactome topology and network analysis applied on a comprehensive, manually curated and semantically consistent knowledge source MetaBase and demonstrate several case studies in different disease areas.

Indexed as

Knowledge BasesDatabases, ProteinHumansProteinsProteomicsProteins

Identifiers

PMID23176192
PMCPMC3489533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.