ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2013
Variation in sodium current amplitude between vasopressin and oxytocin hypothalamic supraoptic neurons.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrophysiological properties of identified oxytocin and vasopressin neurones.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Biophysical characteristics of tetrodotoxin-sensitive sodium (Na(+)) currents were studied in vasopressin (VP) and oxytocin (OT) supraoptic neurons acutely isolated from rat hypothalamus. Na(+) current density (pA/pF) was significantly greater in VP neurons than in OT neurons. No significant difference between VP and OT neurons was detected regarding the voltage dependence of activation and steady-state inactivation, or rate of recovery from inactivation of Na(+) currents. In both VP and OT neurons, the macroscopic inactivation of the Na(+) currents was best fitted with a double-exponential expression suggesting two rates of inactivation. Also in both types, the time course of recovery from inactivation proceeded with fast and slow time constants averaging around 8 and 350 ms, respectively, suggesting the presence of multiple pathways of recovery from inactivation. The slower time constant of recovery of inactivation may be involved in the decrease in action potential (AP) amplitude that occurs after the first spike during burst firing in both neuronal types. The larger amplitude of Na(+) currents in VP vs. OT neurons may explain the previous observations that VP neurons exhibit a lower AP threshold and greater AP amplitude than OT neurons, and may serve to differently tune the firing properties and responses to neuromodulators of the respective neuronal types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.