ArticleGenome biology and evolution2012
Slow DNA loss in the gigantic genomes of salamanders.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developmental speed and chronological time exert opposing effects on the spontaneous mutation rate inEvolution letters · 2026Article
- A mammalian-like piRNA pathway in Axolotl reveals the origins of piRNA-directed DNA methylation.The EMBO journal · 2026Article
- Skin Colour in Salamanders Is Modulated by Both Epitranscriptomic Methylation and Gene Expression.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- The inbred newt genome unveils molecular mechanisms of behavior, development, and regeneration in urodele amphibians.iScience · 2025Article
- Evolutionary dynamics of repetitive elements and genome size in Tetrigidae (Orthoptera: Caelifera).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The first complete assembly for a lungless urodelan with a "miniaturized" genome, the Northern Dusky Salamander (Plethodontidae: Desmognathus fuscus).G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- DNA gains and losses in gigantic genomes do not track differences in transposable element-host silencing interactions.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Transposable element dynamics in Xenopus laevis embryogenesis: a tale of two coexisting subgenomes.Mobile DNA · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of amphibian genomes: An emerging resource for basic and applied research.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Article
- Article
- Transposable Element Diversity and Activity Patterns in Neotropical Salamanders.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Spatial and Temporal Variation of Precipitation Drives the Genome Size Variation inEcology and evolution · 2024Article
- Determinants of genetic diversity in Neotropical salamanders (Plethodontidae: Bolitoglossini).Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Characterization of immunoglobulinFrontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Now that We Got There, What Next?Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Transposable element expansion and low-level piRNA silencing in grasshoppers may cause genome gigantism.BMC biology · 2022Article
- Transposable Element Diversity Remains High in Gigantic Genomes.Journal of molecular evolution · 2022Article
- Article
- Distinct Retrotransposon Evolution Profile in the Genome of Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus).Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Investigation of the activity of transposable elements and genes involved in their silencing in the newt Cynops orientalis, a species with a giant genome.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evolutionary changes in genome size result from the combined effects of mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift. Insertion and deletion mutations (indels) directly impact genome size by adding or removing sequences. Most species lose more DNA through small indels (i.e., ~1-30 bp) than they gain, which can result in genome reduction over time. Because this rate of DNA loss varies across species, small indel dynamics have been suggested to contribute to genome size evolution. Species with extremely large genomes provide interesting test cases for exploring the link between small indels and genome size; however, most large genomes remain relatively unexplored. Here, we examine rates of DNA loss in the tetrapods with the largest genomes-the salamanders. We used low-coverage genomic shotgun sequence data from four salamander species to examine patterns of insertion, deletion, and substitution in neutrally evolving non-long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposon sequences. For comparison, we estimated genome-wide DNA loss rates in non-LTR retrotransposon sequences from five other vertebrate genomes: Anolis carolinensis, Danio rerio, Gallus gallus, Homo sapiens, and Xenopus tropicalis. Our results show that salamanders have significantly lower rates of DNA loss than do other vertebrates. More specifically, salamanders experience lower numbers of deletions relative to insertions, and both deletions and insertions are skewed toward smaller sizes. On the basis of these patterns, we conclude that slow DNA loss contributes to genomic gigantism in salamanders. We also identify candidate molecular mechanisms underlying these differences and suggest that natural variation in indel dynamics provides a unique opportunity to study the basis of genome stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.