Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23175536›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2013

Is N-feedback involved in the inhibition of nitrogen fixation in drought-stressed Medicago truncatula?

Erena Gil-Quintana, Estíbaliz Larrainzar, Cesar Arrese-Igor, Esther M González

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Nitric Oxide Metabolic Pathway in Drought-Stressed Nodules of Faba Bean (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Transcriptomic Changes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Erena Gil-QuintanaDepartamento de Ciencias del Medio Natural, Universidad Pública de Navarra, 31006 Pamplona, Spain.
Estíbaliz Larrainzar
Cesar Arrese-Igor
Esther M González
Universidad Publica de Navarra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drought stress is a major factor limiting nitrogen fixation (NF) in crop production. However, the regulatory mechanism involved and the origin of the inhibition, whether local or systemic, is still controversial and so far scarcely studied in temperate forage legumes. Medicago truncatula plants were symbiotically grown with a split-root system and exposed to gradual water deprivation. Physiological parameters, NF activity, and amino acid content were measured. The partial drought treatment inhibited NF in the nodules directly exposed to drought stress. Concomitantly, in the droughted below-ground organs, amino acids accumulated prior to any drop in evapotranspiration (ET). It is concluded that drought exerts a local inhibition of NF and drives an overall accumulation of amino acids in diverse plant organs which is independent of the decrease in ET. The general increase in the majority of single amino acids in the whole plant questions the commonly accepted concept of a single amino acid acting as an N-feedback signal.

Indexed as

DroughtsAmino AcidsFeedback, PhysiologicalMedicago truncatulaNitrogenNitrogen FixationPlant LeavesPlant ProteinsRoot Nodules, PlantStress, PhysiologicalAmino AcidsNitrogenPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23175536
PMCPMC3528036
OpenAlexW2108663983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.