Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23175504›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology (Reading, England)2013

OmpR regulation of the uropathogenic Escherichia coli fimB gene in an acidic/high osmolality environment.

Ann E Rentschler, Steven D Lovrich, Robert Fitton, Jodi Enos-Berlage, William R Schwan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology (Reading, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The Flagellar Transcriptional Regulator FtcR ControlsInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Regulation ofMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. CRISPRiFrontiers in nutrition · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. The Regulator OmpR inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  16. In vitroMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  17. Urease Expression in PathogenicFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ann E RentschlerUniversity of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI, USA.
Steven D LovrichGundersen Lutheran Medical Center, La Crosse, WI, USA.
Robert FittonLuther College, Decorah, IA, USA.
Jodi Enos-BerlageLuther College, Decorah, IA, USA.
William R SchwanUniversity of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI, USA.
Luther College · USUniversity of Wisconsin–La Crosse · USGundersen Lutheran Hospital · US

Funding

OmpR and acid regulation of Escherichia coli fim genesR15AI065432 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LA CROSSE · PI SCHWAN, WILLIAM R · 2007 to 2007
$185k
NIAID NIH HHS AI065432-01A2NIAID NIH HHS R15 AI065432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) causes more than 90 % of all human urinary tract infections through type 1 piliated UPEC cells binding to bladder epithelial cells. The FimB and FimE site-specific recombinases orient the fimS element containing the fimA structural gene promoter. Regulation of fimB and fimE depends on environmental pH and osmolality. The EnvZ/OmpR two-component system affects osmoregulation in E. coli. To ascertain if OmpR directly regulated the fimB gene promoters, gel mobility shift and DNase I footprinting experiments were performed using OmpR or phosphorylated OmpR (OmpR-P) mixed with the fimB promoter regions of UPEC strain NU149. Both OmpR-P and OmpR bound weakly to one fimB promoter. Because there was weak binding to one fimB promoter, strain NU149 was grown in different pH and osmolality environments, and total RNAs were extracted from each population and converted to cDNAs. Quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR showed no differences in ompR transcription among the different growth conditions. Conversely, Western blots showed a significant increase in OmpR protein in UPEC cells grown in a combined low pH/high osmolality environment versus a neutral pH/high osmolality environment. In a high osmolality environment, the ompR mutant expressed more fimB transcripts and Phase-ON positioning of the fimS element as well as higher type 1 pili levels than wild-type cells. Together these results suggest that OmpR may be post-transcriptionally regulated in UPEC cells growing in a low pH/high osmolality environment, which regulates fimB in UPEC.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialBacterial ProteinsCarboxylic AcidsDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA FootprintingElectrophoretic Mobility Shift AssayEscherichia coli ProteinsGene Expression ProfilingHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationIntegrasesOsmolar ConcentrationOsmotic PressureProtein BindingReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionBacterial ProteinsCarboxylic AcidsDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsfimB protein, E coliIntegrasesosmolarity response regulator proteinsTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID23175504
PMCPMC3709560
OpenAlexW2119525892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.