ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013
Rapid detection of Campylobacter antigen by enzyme immunoassay leads to increased positivity rates.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Campylobacter culture fails to correctly detect Campylobacter in 30% of positive patient stool specimens compared to non-cultural methods.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019Article
- Impact of Culture-Independent Diagnostic Testing on Recovery of Enteric Bacterial Infections.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018Observational
- Comparison of the Filtration Culture and Multiple Real-Time PCR Examination forFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Revisiting the Roles of Culture and Culture-Independent Detection Tests for Campylobacter.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016Article
- Multicenter Evaluation of Clinical Diagnostic Methods for Detection and Isolation of Campylobacter spp. from Stool.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016Article
- Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: Diagnosis of Bacterial GastroenteritisClinical microbiology reviews · 2015Review
- Update on the burden of Campylobacter in developing countries.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2014Review
- Accurate detection of Campylobacter spp. antigens by immunochromatography and enzyme immunoassay in routine microbiological laboratory.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2014Article
- Detection of Campylobacter in stool and determination of significance by culture, enzyme immunoassay, and PCR in developing countries.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2014Article
- Hemolytic uremic syndrome following infection with O111 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli revealed through molecular diagnostics.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Campylobacter antigen detection by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) provides rapid results compared to traditional culture. However, concern exists regarding specificity. Verification studies of an EIA compared to culture revealed a positive predictive value (PPV) of 91%, whereas PPV fell to 42% during routine diagnostic testing. We suggest all positive EIA results be confirmed via culture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.