Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23175249›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013

Mycobacterial interspersed repetitive-unit-variable-number tandem-repeat (MIRU-VNTR) genotyping of mycobacterium intracellulare for strain comparison with establishment of a PCR-based database.

Elena Iakhiaeva, Steven McNulty, Barbara A Brown Elliott, Joseph O Falkinham, Myra D Williams, Ravikiran Vasireddy, Rebecca W Wilson, Christine Turenne, Richard J Wallace

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Amikacin Liposome Inhalation Suspension forAnnals of the American Thoracic Society · 2021
    Trial
  2. Randomized Trial of Liposomal Amikacin for Inhalation in Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2017
    Trial
  3. TheMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  4. Variability of macrolide-resistant profile inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Highly Discriminative Genotyping ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Differential Genotyping ofMicroorganisms · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elena IakhiaevaMycobacteria/Nocardia Laboratory, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, Texas, USA.
Steven McNulty
Barbara A Brown Elliott
Joseph O Falkinham
Myra D Williams
Ravikiran Vasireddy
Rebecca W Wilson
Christine Turenne
Richard J Wallace
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler · USVirginia Tech · USSaskatchewan Disease Control Laboratory · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strain comparison is important to population genetics and to evaluate relapses in patients with Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) lung disease, but the "gold standard" of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is time-consuming and complex. We used variable-number tandem repeats (VNTR) for fingerprinting of respiratory isolates of M. intracellulare from patients with underlying bronchiectasis, to establish a nonsequence-based database for population analysis. Different genotypes identified by PFGE underwent species identification using a 16S rRNA gene multiplex PCR. Genotypes of M. intracellulare were confirmed by internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) sequencing and characterized using seven VNTR primers. The pattern of VNTR amplicon sizes and repeat number defined each specific VNTR type. Forty-two VNTR types were identified among 84 genotypes. PFGE revealed most isolates with the same VNTR type to be clonal or exhibit similar grouping of bands. Repetitive sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) showed minimal pattern diversity between VNTR types compared to PFGE. Fingerprinting of relapse isolates from 31 treated patients using VNTR combined with 16S multiplex PCR unambiguously and reliably distinguished different genotypes from the same patient, with results comparable to those of PFGE. VNTR for strain comparison is easier and faster than PFGE, is as accurate as PFGE, and does not require sequencing. Starting with a collection of 167 M. intracellulare isolates, VNTR distinguished M. intracellulare into 42 clonal groups. Comparison of isolates from different geographic areas, habitats, and clinical settings is now possible.

Indexed as

GenotypeMinisatellite RepeatsAllelesBacterial Typing TechniquesDatabases, Nucleic AcidHumansMolecular Sequence DataMultilocus Sequence TypingMycobacterium avium ComplexMycobacterium avium-intracellulare InfectionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID23175249
PMCPMC3553894
OpenAlexW2152081264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.