ArticleBMC medicine2012
A commentary on evidenced-based parenting programs: redressing misconceptions of the empirical support for Triple P.
Article in BMC medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Pathways Triple P on Pediatric Health-Related Quality of Life in Maltreated Children.Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP · 2018Trial
- Effectiveness of Positive Discipline Parenting Program on Parenting Style, and Child Adaptive Behavior.Child psychiatry and human development · 2022Article
- Article
- Sustained Effectiveness of Evidence-Based Parenting Programs After the Research Trial Ends.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Acceptability of a Positive Parenting Programme on a Mother and Baby Unit: Q-Methodology with Staff.Journal of child and family studies · 2017Article
- Triple P-Positive Parenting programs: the folly of basing social policy on underpowered flawed studies.BMC medicine · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A meta-analytic review of the Triple P-Positive Parenting program by Wilson et al., recently published in BMC Medicine, claimed to demonstrate that although Triple P is widely disseminated and adopted, the evidence attesting to the effectiveness of the program is not as convincing as it may appear. Although this review addresses the important issue of evaluation and reporting methods within evidence-based interventions, we contend that the Wilson et al. review contains a number of significant conceptual, methodological and interpretational inadequacies that render the key conclusions of their review problematic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.