Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23173194›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2013

Towards a simplification of models using regression trees.

Y Eynaud, D Nerini, M Baklouti, J-C Poggiale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Herbivore space use influences coral reef recovery.Royal Society open science · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Y EynaudAix-Marseille Université, Université du Sud Toulon-Var, Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography (MIO), Marseille Cedex 09, France. yoan.eynaud@univ-amu.fr
D Nerini
M Baklouti
J-C Poggiale

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over-parametrization in modelling is a well-known issue that makes it hard to identify which part of a model is responsible for a given behaviour. In line with that ascertainment, this work presents the outline of an empirical method to simplify models by decreasing the number of parameters. By using regression trees to classify outputs according to related input parameters, the method provides the modeller with an objective tool to reduce the range of the used parameters and, under certain conditions, to establish relations between them. Thereby, the complexity of the model is reduced on the basis of mathematical arguments. As an example, a dynamic energy budget-based model of a mesopelagic bacterial ecosystem is simplified using the presented method. The main benefits of such a method are thus highlighted: (i) more robust parameter estimations; (ii) less complex formulations; and (iii) fewer modelling assumptions. To conclude, the difficulties encountered are discussed, and several solutions are proposed to deal with them.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalRegression AnalysisEcology

Identifiers

PMID23173194
PMCPMC3565689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.