ArticleGenetics2013
The relationship between F(ST) and the frequency of the most frequent allele.
Article in Genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
99 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic analysis of breed composition and population structure in Montana composite cattle.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026Article
- Vegetative Propagation Preserves Genomic Diversity and Informs Translocation Strategies in a Rare Clonal Plant.Evolutionary applications · 2026Article
- Reflections on the Human Genome Diversity Project: a conversation with Marcus W. Feldman, Henry T. Greely, and Mary-Claire King.Genetics · 2026Article
- Identifying Key Biodiversity Areas Based on Distinct Genetic Diversity.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Using mathematical constraints to explain narrow ranges for allele-sharing dissimilarities.Theoretical population biology · 2025Article
- Archaic adaptive introgression in modern human reproductive genes.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Mathematical bounds on rTheoretical population biology · 2025Article
- Error rates in QST-FST comparisons depend on genetic architecture and estimation procedures.Genetics · 2025Article
- Comprehensive elucidation on the genetic profile of the Hezhou Han populationForensic sciences research · 2025Article
- High Diversity and Low Genetic Differentiation Among Geographic Populations ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Comparative population genomics of manta rays has global implications for management.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Adaptive introgression in modern human circadian rhythm genes.Npj biological timing and sleep · 2025Article
- Mathematical bounds onbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Error rates inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Characterization of fine geographic scale population genetics in sugar kelp (Saccharina latissima) using genome-wide markers.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Wright's Hierarchical F-Statistics.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Genomic prediction for agronomic traits in a diverse Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) germplasm collection.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Mathematical bounds on Shannon entropy given the abundance of the ith most abundant taxon.Journal of mathematical biology · 2023Article
- Performance Comparison of Computational Methods for the Prediction of the Function and Pathogenicity of Non-coding Variants.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Genome properties of key oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) breeding populations.Journal of applied genetics · 2022Article
39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
F(ST) is frequently used as a summary of genetic differentiation among groups. It has been suggested that F(ST) depends on the allele frequencies at a locus, as it exhibits a variety of peculiar properties related to genetic diversity: higher values for biallelic single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) than for multiallelic microsatellites, low values among high-diversity populations viewed as substantially distinct, and low values for populations that differ primarily in their profiles of rare alleles. A full mathematical understanding of the dependence of F(ST) on allele frequencies, however, has been elusive. Here, we examine the relationship between F(ST) and the frequency of the most frequent allele, demonstrating that the range of values that F(ST) can take is restricted considerably by the allele-frequency distribution. For a two-population model, we derive strict bounds on F(ST) as a function of the frequency M of the allele with highest mean frequency between the pair of populations. Using these bounds, we show that for a value of M chosen uniformly between 0 and 1 at a multiallelic locus whose number of alleles is left unspecified, the mean maximum F(ST) is ∼0.3585. Further, F(ST) is restricted to values much less than 1 when M is low or high, and the contribution to the maximum F(ST) made by the most frequent allele is on average ∼0.4485. Using bounds on homozygosity that we have previously derived as functions of M, we describe strict bounds on F(ST) in terms of the homozygosity of the total population, finding that the mean maximum F(ST) given this homozygosity is 1 - ln 2 ≈ 0.3069. Our results provide a conceptual basis for understanding the dependence of F(ST) on allele frequencies and genetic diversity and for interpreting the roles of these quantities in computations of F(ST) from population-genetic data. Further, our analysis suggests that many unusual observations of F(ST), including the relatively low F(ST) values in high-diversity human populations from Africa and the relatively low estimates of F(ST) for microsatellites compared to SNPs, can be understood not as biological phenomena associated with different groups of populations or classes of markers but rather as consequences of the intrinsic mathematical dependence of F(ST) on the properties of allele-frequency distributions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.