Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23172692›Full record

SynthesisPharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2013

Disease risk score as a confounder summary method: systematic review and recommendations.

Mina Tadrous, Joshua J Gagne, Til Stürmer, Suzanne M Cadarette

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mpox in People With HIV: Predictors of Diagnosis, Outcomes, and Vaccine Effectiveness in a Multisite Cohort.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Socioeconomic vulnerability and osteoporosis treatment disparities during COVID-19 lockdown among U.S. medicare enrollees who initiated romosozumab.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mina TadrousLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Joshua J Gagne
Til Stürmer
Suzanne M Cadarette

Funding

Propensity Scores and Preventive Drug Use in the ElderlyR01AG023178 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI STURMER, TIL · 2005 to 2014
$2.7M
Medication Use, Cormobidity and Outcomes in Aging PopulationsR01AG018833 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI GLYNN, ROBERT J · 2002 to 2010
$2.0M
Medication Use, Comorbidity and Outcomes in Aging populationsR56AG018833 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI GLYNN, ROBERT J · 2007 to 2007
$394k
CIHR GSD-11342CIHR MSH-95364NIA NIH HHS R01 AG018833NIA NIH HHS R01 AG023178NIA NIH HHS R56 AG018833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo systematically examine trends and applications of the disease risk score (DRS) as a confounder summary method.

methodsWe completed a systematic search of MEDLINE and Web of Science® to identify all English language articles that applied DRS methods. We tabulated the number of publications by year and type (empirical application, methodological contribution, or review paper) and summarized methods used in empirical applications overall and by publication year (<2000, ≥2000).

resultsOf 714 unique articles identified, 97 examined DRS methods and 86 were empirical applications. We observed a bimodal distribution in the number of publications over time, with a peak 1979-1980, and resurgence since 2000. The majority of applications with methodological detail derived DRS using logistic regression (47%), used DRS as a categorical variable in regression (93%), and applied DRS in a non-experimental cohort (47%) or case-control (42%) study. Few studies examined effect modification by outcome risk (23%).

conclusionUse of DRS methods has increased yet remains low. Comparative effectiveness research may benefit from more DRS applications, particularly to examine effect modification by outcome risk. Standardized terminology may facilitate identification, application, and comprehension of DRS methods. More research is needed to support the application of DRS methods, particularly in case-control studies.

Indexed as

Confounding Factors, EpidemiologicHealth Planning GuidelinesAnimalsDiseaseHumansResearch DesignRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID23172692
PMCPMC3691557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.