Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23172636›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2013

Safety and efficacy of decitabine in combination with temozolomide in metastatic melanoma: a phase I/II study and pharmacokinetic analysis.

H A Tawbi, J H Beumer, A A Tarhini, S Moschos, S C Buch, M J Egorin, Y Lin, S Christner, J M Kirkwood

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Drugging the Epigenome: Overcoming Resistance to Targeted and Immunotherapies in Melanoma.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

H A TawbiDepartment of Medicine/Division of Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh 15232, USA. tawbih@upmc.edu
J H Beumer
A A Tarhini
S Moschos
S C Buch
M J Egorin
Y Lin
S Christner
J M Kirkwood
University of Pittsburgh · USCenter for Clinical Research (United States) · US

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Leonard J. Appleman · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
Therapuetic Immune Targeting of EphA2 Expressed by Melanoma & Its Tumor-AssociateP50CA121973 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BECICH, MICHAEL JOHN · 2008 to 2018
$22.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005NCI NIH HHS P30-CA47904NCI NIH HHS P50 CA121973NCI NIH HHS P50-CA121973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTemozolomide (TMZ) is widely used for chemotherapy of metastatic melanoma. We hypothesized that epigenetic modulators will reverse chemotherapy resistance, and in this article, we report studies that sought to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety, and efficacy of decitabine (DAC) combined with TMZ. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn phase I, DAC was given at two dose levels: 0.075 and 0.15 mg/kg intravenously daily × 5 days/week for 2 weeks, TMZ orally 75 mg/m(2) qd for weeks 2-5 of a 6-week cycle. The phase II portion used a two-stage Simon design with a primary end point of objective response rate (ORR).

resultsThe RP2D is DAC 0.15 mg/kg and TMZ 75 mg/m(2). The phase II portion enrolled 35 patients, 88% had M1c disease; 42% had history of brain metastases. The best responses were 2 complete response (CR), 4 partial response (PR), 14 stable disease (SD), and 13 progressive disease (PD); 18% ORR and 61% clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD). The median overall survival (OS) was 12.4 months; the 1-year OS rate was 56%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was common but lasted >7 days in six patients.

conclusionsThe combination of DAC and TMZ is safe, leads to 18% ORR and 12.4-month median OS, suggesting possible superiority over the historical 1-year OS rate, and warrants further evaluation in a randomized setting.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAzacitidineDacarbazineDecitabineDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Administration ScheduleDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisAntineoplastic AgentsAzacitidineDacarbazineDecitabineTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID23172636
PMCPMC3603441
OpenAlexW2164738877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.