ReviewGene therapy2013
Understanding lentiviral vector chromatin targeting: working to reduce insertional mutagenic potential for gene therapy.
Review in Gene therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- CAR-NK cell therapy for hematologic malignancies: advances, challenges and optimization strategies.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Review
- Properties and Application of Pseudotyped Lentiviral Vectors.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Interlaboratory assessment of candidate reference materials for lentiviral vector copy number and integration site measurements.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025Article
- Safety and feasibility of 4-1BB co-stimulated CD19-specific CAR-NK cell therapy in refractory/relapsed large B cell lymphoma: a phase 1 trial.Nature cancer · 2025Article
- Article
- Precision Genetic Therapies: Balancing Risk and Benefit in Patients with Heart Failure.Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
- Natural Killer-Based Therapy: A Prospective Thought for Cancer Treatment Related to Diversified Drug Delivery Pathways.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Current Landscape of Gene Therapy for the Treatment of Cardiovascular Disorders.Current gene therapy · 2024Review
- Viral Vector-Based Gene Therapy for Epilepsy: What Does the Future Hold?Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2024Article
- Harnessing cell reprogramming for cardiac biological pacing.Journal of biomedical science · 2023Review
- Modified mRNA as a Treatment for Myocardial Infarction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- CAR-NK as a Rapidly Developed and Efficient Immunotherapeutic Strategy against Cancer.Cancers · 2022Review
- Time to evolve: predicting engineered T cell-associated toxicity with next-generation models.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2022Review
- The War Is on: The Immune System against Glioblastoma-How Can NK Cells Drive This Battle?Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Article
- Rapid Progress in Immunotherapies for Multiple Myeloma: An Updated Comprehensive Review.Cancers · 2021Review
- An Analysis of Mechanisms for Cellular Uptake of miRNAs to Enhance Drug Delivery and Efficacy in Cancer Chemoresistance.Non-coding RNA · 2021Review
- Cell-Based Tracers as Trojan Horses for Image-Guided Surgery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Selective Cytotoxicity of Single and Dual Anti-CD19 and Anti-CD138 Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Natural Killer Cells against Hematologic Malignancies.Journal of immunology research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Replication-deficient retroviruses have been successfully utilized as vectors, offering an efficient, stable method of therapeutic gene delivery. Many examples exist proving this mode of integrative gene transfer is both effective and safe in cultured systems and clinical trials. Along with their success, severe side effects have occurred with early retroviral vectors causing a shift in the approach to vector design before further clinical testing. Several alternative delivery methods are available but lentiviral vectors (LV) are among the most favorable as they are already well understood. LV offer safer integration site selection profiles and a lower degree of genotoxicity, compared with γ-retroviral vectors. Following their introduction, development of the self-inactivating vector configuration was a huge step to this mode of therapy but did not confer full protection against insertional mutagenesis. As a result integration, modeling must be improved to eventually avoid this possibility. The cellular factor LEDGF/p75 seems to play an essential role in the process of LV site selection and its interactions with chromatin are being quickly resolved. LEDGF/p75 is at the center of one example directed integration effort where recombinant products bias the integration event, a step toward fully directed integration into pre-determined benign loci. A more accurate picture of the details of LEDGF/p75 in the natural integration process is emerging, including new binding specificities, chromatin interaction kinetics and additional cellular factors. Together with next-generation sequencing technology and bio-informatics to analyze integration patterns, these advancements will lead to highly focused directed integration, accelerating wide-spread acceptance of LV for gene therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.