Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23171536›Full record

Trial reportTrials2012

INTERBED: internet-based guided self-help for overweight and obese patients with full or subsyndromal binge eating disorder. A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Martina de Zwaan, Stephan Herpertz, Stephan Zipfel, Brunna Tuschen-Caffier, Hans-Christoph Friederich, Frauke Schmidt, Olaf Gefeller, Andreas Mayr, Tony Lam, Carmen Schade-Brittinger and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06495619 (Effectiveness of Integrative Intervention Strategies for Binge Eating in Patients With Overweight or Obesity), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06495619 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Integrative Intervention Strategies for Binge Eating in Patients With Overweight or Obesity: A Multidisciplinary Approach

TypeinterventionalSponsorG. d'Annunzio UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsBinge Eating, Overweight and ObesityArmstreatment-as-usual, combined TAU and guided self-help, combined TAU, GSH, and biofeedback
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Addressing critical gaps in the treatment of eating disorders.The International journal of eating disorders · 2017
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Martina de ZwaanDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. dezwaan.martina@mh-hannover.de
Stephan Herpertz
Stephan Zipfel
Brunna Tuschen-Caffier
Hans-Christoph Friederich
Frauke Schmidt
Olaf Gefeller
Andreas Mayr
Tony Lam
Carmen Schade-Brittinger
Anja Hilbert

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBinge eating disorder (BED) is a prevalent clinical eating disorder associated with increased psychopathology, psychiatric comorbidity, overweight and obesity, and increased health care costs. Since its inclusion in the DSM-IV, a few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have suggested efficacy of book-based self-help interventions in the treatment of this disorder. However, evidence from larger RCTs is needed. Delivery of self-help through new technologies such as the internet should be investigated in particular, as these approaches have the potential to be more interactive and thus more attractive to patients than book-based approaches. This study will evaluate the efficacy of an internet-based guided self-help program (GSH-I) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), which has been proven in several studies to be the gold standard treatment for BED, in a prospective multicenter randomized trial.

methodsThe study assumes the noninferiority of GSH-I compared to CBT. Both treatments lasted 4 months, and maintenance of outcome will be assessed 6 and 18 months after the end of treatment. A total of 175 patients with BED and a body mass index between 27 and 40 kg/m2 were randomized at 7 centers in Germany and Switzerland. A 20% attrition rate was assumed. As in most BED treatment trials, the difference in the number of binge eating days over the past 28 days is the primary outcome variable. Secondary outcome measures include the specific eating disorder psychopathology, general psychopathology, body weight, quality of life, and self-esteem. Predictors and moderators of treatment outcome will be determined, and the cost-effectiveness of both treatment conditions will be evaluated.

resultsThe methodology for the INTERBED study has been detailed.

conclusionsAlthough there is evidence that CBT is the first-line treatment for BED, it is not widely available. As BED is still a recent diagnostic category, many cases likely remain undiagnosed, and a large number of patients either receive delayed treatment or never get adequate treatment. A multicenter efficacy trial will give insight into the efficacy of a new internet-based guided self-help program and will allow a direct comparison to the evidence-based gold standard treatment of CBT in Germany.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN40484777. German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00000409.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyFeeding BehaviorInternetResearch DesignTherapy, Computer-AssistedBinge-Eating DisorderClinical ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisGermanyHealth Care CostsHumansObesityOverweightProspective StudiesSwitzerlandTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID23171536
PMCPMC3570452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.