Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23171354›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2012

Effectiveness of an intervention at construction worksites on work engagement, social support, physical workload, and need for recovery: results from a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Karen M Oude Hengel, Birgitte M Blatter, Catelijne I Joling, Allard J van der Beek, Paulien M Bongers

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Effectiveness of Interventions to Promote Sustainable Employability: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Stimulating Employability and Job Crafting Behaviour of Physicians: A Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Trial
  11. A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of a Total Worker HealthInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. The physical activity health paradox: what is it, why might it happen, and where to go from here?The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karen M Oude HengelNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, P,O, Box 718, Hoofddorp, AS 2130, The Netherlands. karen.oudehengel@tno.nl.
Birgitte M Blatter
Catelijne I Joling
Allard J van der Beek
Paulien M Bongers
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLEMGO Institute for Health and Care Research · NLNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo prolong sustainable healthy working lives of construction workers, a worksite prevention program was developed which aimed to improve the health and work ability of construction workers. The aim of the current study was to investigate the effectiveness of this program on social support at work, work engagement, physical workload and need for recovery.

methodsFifteen departments from six construction companies participated in this cluster randomized controlled trial; 8 departments (n=171 workers) were randomized to an intervention group and 7 departments (n=122 workers) to a control group. The intervention consisted of two individual training sessions of a physical therapist to lower the physical workload, a Rest-Break tool to improve the balance between work and recovery, and two empowerment training sessions to increase the influence of the construction workers at the worksite. Data on work engagement, social support at work, physical workload, and need for recovery were collected at baseline, and at three, six and 12 months after the start of the intervention using questionnaires.

resultsNo differences between the intervention and control group were found for work engagement, social support at work, and need for recovery. At 6 months follow-up, the control group reported a small but statistically significant reduction of physical workload.

conclusionThe intervention neither improved social support nor work engagement, nor was it effective in reducing the physical workload and need for recovery among construction workers.

trial registrationNTR1278.

Indexed as

Construction IndustryInterprofessional RelationsNeeds AssessmentOccupational HealthSocial SupportAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkloadWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID23171354
PMCPMC3534539
OpenAlexW2096487457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.