ArticleMalaria journal2012
Prospective malaria control using entomopathogenic fungi: comparative evaluation of impact on transmission and selection for resistance.
Article in Malaria journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy ofInsects · 2024Article
- Microencapsulation of a Native Strain of the Entomopathogenic FungusTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023Article
- Genetics and immunity of Anopheles response to the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae overlap with immunity to Plasmodium.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Efficacy of vector control tools against malaria-infected mosquitoes.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Isolation and identification of microflora from the midgut and salivary glands of Anopheles species in malaria endemic areas of Ethiopia.BMC microbiology · 2019Article
- Putting evolution in elimination: Winning our ongoing battle with evolving malaria mosquitoes and parasites.Evolutionary applications · 2018Review
- Biological control of human disease vectors: a perspective on challenges and opportunities.BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2018Review
- Article
- Review
- The potential for fungal biopesticides to reduce malaria transmission under diverse environmental conditions.The Journal of applied ecology · 2015Article
- Modeling Combinations of Pre-erythrocytic Plasmodium falciparum Malaria Vaccines.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2015Article
- A genetic model of the effects of insecticide-treated bed nets on the evolution of insecticide-resistance.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2015Article
- Evolutionary decay and the prospects for long-term disease intervention using engineered insect vectors.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2015Review
- Biological Control of the Chagas Disease Vector Triatoma infestans with the Entomopathogenic Fungus Beauveria bassiana Combined with an Aggregation Cue: Field, Laboratory and Mathematical Modeling Assessment.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2015Article
- Interactions between a fungal entomopathogen and malaria parasites within a mosquito vector.Malaria journal · 2015Article
- Malaria mosquitoes attracted by fatal fungus.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChemical insecticides against adult mosquitoes are a key element in most malaria management programmes, but their efficacy is threatened by the evolution of insecticide-resistant mosquitoes. By killing only older mosquitoes, entomopathogenic fungi can in principle significantly impact parasite transmission while imposing much less selection for resistance. Here an assessment is made as to which of the wide range of possible virulence characteristics for fungal biopesticides best realise this potential.
methodsWith mathematical models that capture relevant timings and survival probabilities within successive feeding cycles, transmission and resistance-management metrics are used to compare susceptible and resistant mosquitoes exposed to no intervention, to conventional instant-kill interventions, and to delayed-action biopesticides with a wide range of virulence characteristics.
resultsFungal biopesticides that generate high rates of mortality at around the time mosquitoes first become able to transmit the malaria parasite offer potential for large reductions in transmission while imposing low fitness costs. The best combinations of control and resistance management are generally accessed at high levels of coverage. Strains which have high virulence in malaria-infected mosquitoes but lower virulence in malaria-free mosquitoes offer the ultimate benefit in terms of minimizing selection pressure whilst maximizing impact on transmission. Exploiting this phenotype should be a target for product development. For indoor residual spray programmes, biopesticides may offer substantial advantages over the widely used pyrethroid-based insecticides. Not only do fungal biopesticides provide substantial resistance management gains in the long term, they may also provide greater reductions in transmission before resistance has evolved. This is because fungal spores do not have contact irritancy, reducing the chances that a blood-fed mosquito can survive an encounter and thus live long enough to transmit malaria.
conclusionsDelayed-action products, such as fungal biopesticides, have the potential to achieve reductions in transmission comparable with those achieved with existing instant-kill insecticides, and to sustain this control for substantially longer once resistant alleles arise. Given the current insecticide resistance crisis, efforts should continue to fully explore the operational feasibility of this alternative approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.