ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2012
Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence.
Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 548 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
548 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for risk-stratified breast cancer screening: a systematic review of evidence, clinical integration, and ethical implications in risk assessment tools.La Radiologia medica · 2026Pooled it
- Assessing women's stated preferences for breast cancer screening: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.BMC health services research · 2024Pooled it
- Shared decision-making for supporting women's decisions about breast cancer screening.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Systemic Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: ASCO Resource-Stratified Guideline.JCO global oncology · 2024Guideline
- Can the Clinical Utility of iBreastExam, a Novel Device, Aid in Optimizing Breast Cancer Diagnosis? A Systematic Review.JCO global oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Preoperative Partial Breast Irradiation in Patients with Low-Risk Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review of Literature.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Economic evaluation of breast MRI in screening - a systematic review and basic approach to cost-effectiveness analyses.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Global guidelines for breast cancer screening: A systematic review.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2022Pooled it
- CircRNAs as promising biomarker in diagnosis of breast cancer: An updated meta-analysis.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2021Pooled it
- Preservation of Axillary Lymph Nodes Compared with Complete Dissection in T1-2 Breast Cancer Patients Presenting One or Two Metastatic Sentinel Lymph Nodes: The SINODAR-ONE Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Trial
- Incidence and mortality trends after introduction of lung cancer screening in a community-based healthcare system.Cancer epidemiology · 2026Article
- Oestrogen receptor testing and initiation of adjuvant endocrine therapy in women with ductal carcinoma in situ: a population-based study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Persistent Racial Disparities in Breast Cancer Incidence by Stage and Subtype in a High-Burden State.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Five Decades of Innovation-Tailored Breast Cancer Treatment: 1976-2026.World journal of surgery · 2026Review
- Upgrade and downgrade rates of fibroepithelial lesions in a B3 lesion cohort: a 15-year analysis from a university hospital.The British journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Determinants of Early-Stage Breast Cancer Presentation in Western Kazakhstan: A Population-Based Analysis of Urban-Rural Disparities and Diagnostic Pathways (2015-2025).Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Global patterns and risk factors of breast cancer in women under 35: a population-based study.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Article
- The Effect of Social Associations on Mammography Screening Disparities in Rural Communities: A County-Level Secondary Analysis.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Association between allostatic load and risk of breast carcinoma in situ in the UK biobank.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
488 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo reduce mortality, screening must detect life-threatening disease at an earlier, more curable stage. Effective cancer-screening programs therefore both increase the incidence of cancer detected at an early stage and decrease the incidence of cancer presenting at a late stage.
methodsWe used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data to examine trends from 1976 through 2008 in the incidence of early-stage breast cancer (ductal carcinoma in situ and localized disease) and late-stage breast cancer (regional and distant disease) among women 40 years of age or older.
resultsThe introduction of screening mammography in the United States has been associated with a doubling in the number of cases of early-stage breast cancer that are detected each year, from 112 to 234 cases per 100,000 women--an absolute increase of 122 cases per 100,000 women. Concomitantly, the rate at which women present with late-stage cancer has decreased by 8%, from 102 to 94 cases per 100,000 women--an absolute decrease of 8 cases per 100,000 women. With the assumption of a constant underlying disease burden, only 8 of the 122 additional early-stage cancers diagnosed were expected to progress to advanced disease. After excluding the transient excess incidence associated with hormone-replacement therapy and adjusting for trends in the incidence of breast cancer among women younger than 40 years of age, we estimated that breast cancer was overdiagnosed (i.e., tumors were detected on screening that would never have led to clinical symptoms) in 1.3 million U.S. women in the past 30 years. We estimated that in 2008, breast cancer was overdiagnosed in more than 70,000 women; this accounted for 31% of all breast cancers diagnosed.
conclusionsDespite substantial increases in the number of cases of early-stage breast cancer detected, screening mammography has only marginally reduced the rate at which women present with advanced cancer. Although it is not certain which women have been affected, the imbalance suggests that there is substantial overdiagnosis, accounting for nearly a third of all newly diagnosed breast cancers, and that screening is having, at best, only a small effect on the rate of death from breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23171096What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.