ReviewDrugs2012
Intraurethral alprostadil for erectile dysfunction: a review of the literature.
Review in Drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01776320 (A Phase 4, Open-Label, Non-Randomized, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Satisfaction of VITAROS), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 4, Open-Label, Non-Randomized, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Satisfaction of VITAROS (Transdermal Topical Alprostadil) in Men With Erectile Dysfunction.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- The effect of topical and intraurethral alprostadil on erectile function: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Andrology · 2025Pooled it
- Phytochemical-based nanomedicine as a promising therapeutic strategy for erectile dysfunction.Asian journal of andrology · 2026Review
- Evaluation and management of male sexual dysfunction in Parkinson's disease: A clinical road map.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Review
- Patient Satisfaction and Outcomes of Penile Prosthesis Implantation in Psychogenic and Organic Erectile Dysfunction: A Comparative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The correlation between premature ejaculation and a high incidence of erectile dysfunction and its research progress: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- Efficacy of Hongjing I granule, an herbal medicine, in patients with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction in a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Efficacy of Chinese Herbal Medicine Formula in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Erectile Dysfunction: Study Protocol for a Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
- Erectile Dysfunction: Key Role of Cavernous Smooth Muscle Cells.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Novel Emerging Therapies for Erectile Dysfunction.The world journal of men's health · 2021Review
- The Use of Vasoactive Drugs in the Treatment of Male Erectile Dysfunction: Current Concepts.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Review
- A Review of Current and Emerging Therapeutic Options for Erectile Dysfunction.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Recent advances in the understanding and management of erectile dysfunction.F1000Research · 2019Review
- Treatment of autonomic dysfunction in Parkinson disease and other synucleinopathies.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2018Review
- Non-invasive Management Options for Erectile Dysfunction When a Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor Fails.Drugs & aging · 2018Review
- The treatment of erectile dysfunction in patients with neurogenic disease.Translational andrology and urology · 2016Review
- Erectile dysfunction and its management in patients with diabetes mellitus.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2015Article
- [Conservative therapy of erectile dysfunction].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2015Review
- Acute macular edema following intracorporeal prostaglandin injection for erectile dysfunction.International medical case reports journal · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global burden of erectile dysfunction (ED) is increasing. It is estimated that 8-19% of men in Europe have ED and that by 2025 the prevalence of ED worldwide will reach 322 million. The gold standard therapy for ED is an oral phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor, but they are not suitable for everyone; approximately 25% of patients do not respond to this therapy and it is contraindicated in others, e.g. those with vascular disease. When PDE5 inhibitors are not suitable, available options include intraurethral and intracavernosal alprostadil - a synthetic vasodilator chemically identical to the naturally occurring prostaglandin E(1) indicated for the treatment of ED. Intraurethral alprostadil is delivered by the Medicated System for Erection (MUSE).- a single-use pellet containing alprostadil suspended in polyethylene glycol administered using an applicator. It is recommended that intraurethral alprostadil be initiated at a dose of 500 μg, as it has a higher efficacy than the 250 μg dose, with minimal differences with regard to adverse events. Data from key clinical studies of intraurethral alprostadil show that it has a fast onset of effect and a good safety profile, with no occurrences of priapism, fibrosis (as seen with intracavernosal injection) or the typical systemic effects observed with oral ED pharmacological treatments. Intraurethral alprostadil has been associated with high patient preference, acceptance rates and quality of life versus intracavernosal injection due to its ease of administration. Evidence has shown that combination treatment with sildenafil may be a possible efficient alternative when single oral or local treatment has failed. Intraurethral alprostadil can be administered in all patients irrespective of ED origin and should be the first option in patients with ED for whom therapy with PDE5 inhibitors has failed or is contraindicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.