Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23170910›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2012

Population and sex differences in Drosophila melanogaster brain gene expression.

Ana Catalán, Stephan Hutter, John Parsch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Organization and evolution of sex-biased gene expression inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Expression of De Novo Open Reading Frames in Natural Populations of Drosophila melanogaster.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Plastic Fly: WhatInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ana CatalánDepartment of Biology II, University of Munich (LMU), Grosshaderner Str. 2, Planegg-Martinsried 82152, Germany.
Stephan Hutter
John Parsch
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DELMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChanges in gene regulation are thought to be crucial for the adaptation of organisms to their environment. Transcriptome analyses can be used to identify candidate genes for ecological adaptation, but can be complicated by variation in gene expression between tissues, sexes, or individuals. Here we use high-throughput RNA sequencing of a single Drosophila melanogaster tissue to detect brain-specific differences in gene expression between the sexes and between two populations, one from the ancestral species range in sub-Saharan Africa and one from the recently colonized species range in Europe.

resultsRelatively few genes (<100) displayed sexually dimorphic expression in the brain, but there was an enrichment of sex-biased genes, especially male-biased genes, on the X chromosome. Over 340 genes differed in brain expression between flies from the African and European populations, with the inter-population divergence being highly correlated between males and females. The differentially expressed genes included those involved in stress response, olfaction, and detoxification. Expression differences were associated with transposable element insertions at two genes implicated in insecticide resistance (Cyp6g1 and CHKov1).

conclusionsAnalysis of the brain transcriptome revealed many genes differing in expression between populations that were not detected in previous studies using whole flies. There was little evidence for sex-specific regulatory adaptation in the brain, as most expression differences between populations were observed in both males and females. The enrichment of genes with sexually dimorphic expression on the X chromosome is consistent with dosage compensation mechanisms affecting sex-biased expression in somatic tissues.

Indexed as

Genes, InsectTranscriptomeAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBrainCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingInsecticide ResistanceMaleMutagenesis, InsertionalCyp6g1 protein, DrosophilaCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23170910
PMCPMC3527002
OpenAlexW2159170638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.