Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23170857›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2013

Identification and profiling of CXCR3-CXCR4 chemokine receptor heteromer complexes.

A O Watts, M M H van Lipzig, W C Jaeger, R M Seeber, M van Zwam, J Vinet, M M C van der Lee, M Siderius, G J R Zaman, H W G M Boddeke and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The β2-adrenergic receptor associates with CXCR4 multimers in human cancer cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. NanoBCell reports methods · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Investigation of Receptor Heteromers Using NanoBRET Ligand Binding.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. High CXCR3 on Leukemic Cells DistinguishesJournal of immunology research · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

A O WattsLeiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Science, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M M H van Lipzig
W C Jaeger
R M Seeber
M van Zwam
J Vinet
M M C van der Lee
M Siderius
G J R Zaman
H W G M Boddeke
M J Smit
K D G Pfleger
R Leurs
H F Vischer
Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam · NLHarry Perkins Institute of Medical Research · AUMSD (Netherlands) · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe C-X-C chemokine receptors 3 (CXCR3) and C-X-C chemokine receptors 4 (CXCR4) are involved in various autoimmune diseases and cancers. Small antagonists have previously been shown to cross-inhibit chemokine binding to CXCR4, CC chemokine receptors 2 (CCR2) and 5 (CCR5) heteromers. We investigated whether CXCR3 and CXCR4 can form heteromeric complexes and the binding characteristics of chemokines and small ligand compounds to these chemokine receptor heteromers. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: CXCR3-CXCR4 heteromers were identified in HEK293T cells using co-immunoprecipitation, time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer, saturation BRET and the GPCR-heteromer identification technology (HIT) approach. Equilibrium competition binding and dissociation experiments were performed to detect negative binding cooperativity. KEY

resultsWe provide evidence that chemokine receptors CXCR3 and CXCR4 form heteromeric complexes in HEK293T cells. Chemokine binding was mutually exclusive on membranes co-expressing CXCR3 and CXCR4 as revealed by equilibrium competition binding and dissociation experiments. The small CXCR3 agonist VUF10661 impaired binding of CXCL12 to CXCR4, whereas small antagonists were unable to cross-inhibit chemokine binding to the other chemokine receptor. In contrast, negative binding cooperativity between CXCR3 and CXCR4 chemokines was not observed in intact cells. However, using the GPCR-HIT approach, we have evidence for specific β-arrestin2 recruitment to CXCR3-CXCR4 heteromers in response to agonist stimulation. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This study indicates that heteromeric CXCR3-CXCR4 complexes may act as functional units in living cells, which potentially open up novel therapeutic opportunities.

Indexed as

Arrestinsbeta-ArrestinsCell MembraneChemokine CXCL10Chemokine CXCL12Fluorescence Resonance Energy TransferHEK293 CellsHumansImmunoprecipitationLigandsProtein BindingProtein MultimerizationRadioligand AssayReceptors, CXCR3Receptors, CXCR4Signal TransductionArrestinsbeta-ArrestinsChemokine CXCL10Chemokine CXCL12LigandsReceptors, CXCR3Receptors, CXCR4

Identifiers

PMID23170857
PMCPMC3605874
OpenAlexW1542145255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.