Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23169941›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2012

Diagnostic microbiologic methods in the GEMS-1 case/control study.

Sandra Panchalingam, Martin Antonio, Anowar Hossain, Inacio Mandomando, Ben Ochieng, Joseph Oundo, T Ramamurthy, Boubou Tamboura, Anita K M Zaidi, William Petri and 15 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 146 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
146citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

146 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 197 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Complete genomes of diverseMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  6. Complete genomes ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Atypical enteropathogenicFrontiers in public health · 2026
    Article
  11. Complete genomes of hybridMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  12. Draft genomes ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  13. Importance ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Whole-genome-based characterization ofMicrobial genomics · 2025
    Article
  20. Antibiotic Resistance Profile of EnterovirulentInternational journal of microbiology · 2025
    Article

86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Berkeley, Lynette Y [added]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 15 institutions in 13 countries.

Sandra PanchalingamCenter for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Martin Antonio
Anowar Hossain
Inacio Mandomando
Ben Ochieng
Joseph Oundo
T Ramamurthy
Boubou Tamboura
Anita K M Zaidi
William Petri
Eric Houpt
Patrick Murray
Valeria Prado
Roberto Vidal
Duncan Steele
Nancy Strockbine
Philippe Sansonetti
Roger I Glass
Roy M Robins-Browne
Marija Tauschek
Ann-Marie Svennerholm
Lynette Y Berkeley
Karen Kotloff
Myron M Levine
James P Nataro
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USKenya Medical Research Institute · KEUniversity of Chile · CLUniversity of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Virginia · USAga Khan University · PKCentre Pour le Développement des Vaccins-Mali · MLInstitut Pasteur · FRInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDManhiça Health Research Centre · MZMedical Research Council · GBNational Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases · INUniversity of Gothenburg · SEWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand the etiology of moderate-to-severe diarrhea among children in high mortality areas of sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, we performed a comprehensive case/control study of children aged <5 years at 7 sites. Each site employed an identical case/control study design and each utilized a uniform comprehensive set of microbiological assays to identify the likely bacterial, viral and protozoal etiologies. The selected assays effected a balanced consideration of cost, robustness and performance, and all assays were performed at the study sites. Identification of bacterial pathogens employed streamlined conventional bacteriologic biochemical and serological algorithms. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli were identified by application of a multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for enterotoxigenic, enteroaggregative, and enteropathogenic E. coli. Rotavirus, adenovirus, Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia enterica, and Cryptosporidium species were detected by commercially available enzyme immunoassays on stool samples. Samples positive for adenovirus were further evaluated for adenovirus serotypes 40 and 41. We developed a novel multiplex assay to detect norovirus (types 1 and 2), astrovirus, and sapovirus. The portfolio of diagnostic assays used in the GEMS study can be broadly applied in developing countries seeking robust cost-effective methods for enteric pathogen detection.

Indexed as

Africa South of the SaharaAsia, WesternCase-Control StudiesCryptosporidiumDiarrheaEntamoeba histolyticaEscherichia coliGiardiaHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesMicrobiological TechniquesMulticenter Studies as TopicParasitologyPolymerase Chain ReactionQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality Control

Identifiers

PMID23169941
PMCPMC3502308
OpenAlexW2131960275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.