Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23169630›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Self-boosting vaccines and their implications for herd immunity.

Nimalan Arinaminpathy, Jennie S Lavine, Bryan T Grenfell

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Waning immunity drives respiratory virus evolution and reinfection.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Recombinant vector vaccine evolution.PLoS computational biology · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Pertussis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nimalan ArinaminpathyDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. nimpathy@princeton.edu
Jennie S Lavine
Bryan T Grenfell
Princeton University · USFogarty International Center · US

Funding

Infrastructure for Population Research at PrincetonR24HD047879 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MASSEY, DOUGLAS S · 2004 to 2013
$7.3M
Synthesizing the Evolutionary and Ecological Dynamics of Acute RNA Viruses: CompaR01GM083983 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI GRENFELL, BRYAN · 2008 to 2011
$1.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD047879NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083983NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083983-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in vaccine technology over the past two centuries have facilitated far-reaching impact in the control of many infections, and today's emerging vaccines could likewise open new opportunities in the control of several diseases. Here we consider the potential, population-level effects of a particular class of emerging vaccines that use specific viral vectors to establish long-term, intermittent antigen presentation within a vaccinated host: in essence, "self-boosting" vaccines. In particular, we use mathematical models to explore the potential role of such vaccines in situations where current immunization raises only relatively short-lived protection. Vaccination programs in such cases are generally limited in their ability to raise lasting herd immunity. Moreover, in certain cases mass vaccination can have the counterproductive effect of allowing an increase in severe disease, through reducing opportunities for immunity to be boosted through natural exposure to infection. Such dynamics have been proposed, for example, in relation to pertussis and varicella-zoster virus. In this context we show how self-boosting vaccines could open qualitatively new opportunities, for example by broadening the effective duration of herd immunity that can be achieved with currently used immunogens. At intermediate rates of self-boosting, these vaccines also alleviate the potential counterproductive effects of mass vaccination, through compensating for losses in natural boosting. Importantly, however, we also show how sufficiently high boosting rates may introduce a new regime of unintended consequences, wherein the unvaccinated bear an increased disease burden. Finally, we discuss important caveats and data needs arising from this work.

Indexed as

Models, ImmunologicalGenetic VectorsHumansImmunity, HerdImmunization, SecondaryMass VaccinationTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID23169630
PMCPMC3523845
OpenAlexW2083840136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.