Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23168606›Full record

Trial reportNeurourology and urodynamics2013

What predicts and what mediates the response of urge urinary incontinence to biofeedback?

Neil M Resnick, Subashan Perera, Stasa Tadic, Linda Organist, Mary Alyce Riley, Werner Schaefer, Derek Griffiths

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neil M ResnickDepartment of Medicine (Geriatrics), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. resnickn@pitt.edu
Subashan Perera
Stasa Tadic
Linda Organist
Mary Alyce Riley
Werner Schaefer
Derek Griffiths
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JENNIFER S BRACH · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
Further Enhancing Non-Pharmacological Therapy for IncontinenceR01AG020629 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI RESNICK, NEIL M. · 2003 to 2012
$4.0M
Further Enhancing Treatment of Urge IncontinenceR56AG020629 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI RESNICK, NEIL M. · 2015 to 2015
$354k
NIA NIH HHS AG20629NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827NIA NIH HHS R01 AG020629NIA NIH HHS R56 AG020629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo better target a behavioral approach for urge urinary incontinence (UUI) and enhance its efficacy by (1) identifying predictors of response to biofeedback-assisted pelvic muscle training (BFB), and (2) determining factors that mediate response.

methodsBFB (four biweekly visits) was administered to 183 women > 60 years (mean = 73.6). Before and after intervention, all underwent comprehensive evaluation and videourodynamic testing. Postulated predictors and mediators from four urodynamic domains, specified a priori, were correlated with reduction in UUI frequency.

resultsMedian UUI frequency decreased from 3.2/day to 1/day (P =0.0001). UUI improved by ≥50% in 55% of subjects and by 100% in 13% of subjects. Frequent UUI predicted poor response (P < 0.01). Of the urodynamic parameters, only high amplitude and briskness of detrusor overactivity (DO) predicted decreased response (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01) and these could be measured only in the 43% of subjects with elicitable DO. Decreased DO elicitability was the only urodynamic variable that changed in concert with improvement and thus was a candidate mediator. Response was neither predicted nor mediated by proprioception/warning, cystometric capacity, detrusor contractility, sphincter strength, or baseline DO elicitability.

conclusionsSevere DO predicts poor response to BFB. Good response is mediated by reduction in DO elicitability. Other than baseline UUI frequency, there are no other clinically or urodynamically important predictors or mediators of BFB response in this population. BFB may be best for patients with less severe DO. Future research to enhance its efficacy might better focus on the brain than on the lower urinary tract.

Indexed as

Biofeedback, PsychologyAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPelvic FloorPennsylvaniaProspective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUrinary Bladder, OveractiveUrinary Incontinence, UrgeUrodynamics

Identifiers

PMID23168606
PMCPMC4850903
OpenAlexW2019999727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.