ArticleCirculation2012
Computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction without significant coronary stenosis.
Article in Circulation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incremental value of coronary computed tomography angiography in addition to invasive coronary angiography in MINOCA.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Article
- Computed tomography coronary angiography in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.The British journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Assessment of Cardiac, Vascular, and Pulmonary Pathobiology In Vivo During Acute COVID-19.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- CardiOvaScular Mechanisms In Covid-19: methodology of a prospective observational multimodality imaging study (COSMIC-19 study).BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Observational
- The change in high-sensitivity troponin-T as a risk factor for significant coronary stenosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2021Article
- The Imaging Toolbox to Assess Patients with Suspected Myocardial Infarction in the Absence of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (MINOCA).Current cardiology reports · 2020Review
- Coronary Inflammation by Computed Tomography Pericoronary Fat Attenuation in MINOCA and Tako-Tsubo Syndrome.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Article
- Characteristics of patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) from the ARIAM-SEMICYUC registry: development of a score for predicting MINOCA.Vascular health and risk management · 2019Observational
- Computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction and normal invasive coronary angiography.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2016Article
- Complementary CT Coronary Angiography after Negative Selective Coronary Angiography.Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology · 2015Article
- Article
- Positron emission tomography of the vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque in man--a contemporary review.Clinical physiology and functional imaging · 2014Review
- Evidence of myocardial scarring and microvascular obstruction on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in a series of patients presenting with myocardial infarction without obstructed coronary arteries.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2014Article
- Observational
- Imaging atherosclerosis and risk of plaque rupture.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2013Review
- Smoking gun theory: angiographically normal or mild coronary plaque as a cause of myocardial infarction.Circulation · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is known that a significant number of patients experiencing an acute myocardial infarction have normal coronary arteries or nonsignificant coronary disease at coronary angiography (CA). Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) can identify the presence of plaques, even in the absence of significant coronary stenosis. This study evaluated the role of 64-slice CTCA in detecting and characterizing coronary atherosclerosis in these patients. METHODS AND
resultsConsecutive patients with documented acute myocardial infarction but without significant coronary stenosis at CA underwent late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance and CTCA. Only the 50 patients with an area of myocardial infarction identified by late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance were included in the study. All of the coronary segments were assessed for the presence of plaques. CTCA identified 101 plaques against the 41 identified by CA: 61 (60.4%) located in infarct-related arteries (IRAs) and 40 (39.6%) in non-IRAs. In the IRAs, 22 plaques were noncalcified, 17 mixed, and 22 calcified; in the non-IRAs, 5 plaques were noncalcified, 8 mixed, and 27 calcified (P=0.005). Mean plaque area was greater in the IRAs than in the non-IRAs (6.1±5.4 mm(2) versus 4.2±2.1 mm(2); P=0.03); there was no significant difference in mean percentage stenosis (33.5%±14.6 versus 31.7%±12.2; P=0.59), but the mean remodeling index was significantly different (1.25±0.41 versus 1.08±0.21; P=0.01).
conclusionsCTCA detects coronary plaques in nonstenotic coronary arteries that are underestimated by CA, and identifies a different distribution of plaque types in IRAs and non-IRAs. It may therefore be valuable for diagnosing coronary atherosclerosis in acute myocardial infarction patients without significant coronary stenosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23168414What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.