Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23167911›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2012

REsearch into implementation STrategies to support patients of different ORigins and language background in a variety of European primary care settings (RESTORE): study protocol.

Anne MacFarlane, Catherine O'Donnell, Frances Mair, Mary O'Reilly-de Brún, Tomas de Brún, Wolfgang Spiegel, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Evelyn van Weel-Baumgarten, Christos Lionis, Nicola Burns and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Perimenopause and/or menopause help-seeking among women from ethnic minorities: a qualitative study of primary care practitioners' experiences.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Participatory health research with migrants: Opportunities, challenges, and way forwards.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Review
  7. Participatory implementation research in the field of migrant health: Sustainable changes and ripple effects over time.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Anne MacFarlaneGraduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. anne.macfarlane@ul.ie
Catherine O'Donnell
Frances Mair
Mary O'Reilly-de Brún
Tomas de Brún
Wolfgang Spiegel
Maria van den Muijsenbergh
Evelyn van Weel-Baumgarten
Christos Lionis
Nicola Burns
Katja Gravenhorst
Christine Princz
Erik Teunissen
Francine van den Driessen Mareeuw
Aristoula Saridaki
Maria Papadakaki
Maria Vlahadi
Christopher Dowrick

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe implementation of guidelines and training initiatives to support communication in cross-cultural primary care consultations is ad hoc across a range of international settings with negative consequences particularly for migrants. This situation reflects a well-documented translational gap between evidence and practice and is part of the wider problem of implementing guidelines and the broader range of professional educational and quality interventions in routine practice. In this paper, we describe our use of a contemporary social theory, Normalization Process Theory and participatory research methodology--Participatory Learning and Action--to investigate and support implementation of such guidelines and training initiatives in routine practice.

methodsThis is a qualitative case study, using multiple primary care sites across Europe. Purposive and maximum variation sampling approaches will be used to identify and recruit stakeholders-migrant service users, general practitioners, primary care nurses, practice managers and administrative staff, interpreters, cultural mediators, service planners, and policy makers. We are conducting a mapping exercise to identify relevant guidelines and training initiatives. We will then initiate a PLA-brokered dialogue with stakeholders around Normalization Process Theory's four constructs--coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring. Through this, we will enable stakeholders in each setting to select a single guideline or training initiative for implementation in their local setting. We will prospectively investigate and support the implementation journeys for the five selected interventions. Data will be generated using a Participatory Learning and Action approach to interviews and focus groups. Data analysis will follow the principles of thematic analysis, will occur in iterative cycles throughout the project and will involve participatory co-analysis with key stakeholders to enhance the authenticity and veracity of findings. DISCUSSION: This research employs a unique combination of Normalization Process Theory and Participatory Learning and Action, which will provide a novel approach to the analysis of implementation journeys. The findings will advance knowledge in the field of implementation science because we are using and testing theoretical and methodological approaches so that we can critically appraise their scope to mediate barriers and improve the implementation processes.

Indexed as

CommunicationInformation DisseminationResearch DesignCognitionCultural CompetencyEuropeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInservice TrainingLanguageLearningPractice Guidelines as TopicPrimary Health CarePsychological TheoryQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID23167911
PMCPMC3541149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.