Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23167481›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2012

Protocol for "Seal or Varnish?" (SoV) trial: a randomised controlled trial to measure the relative cost and effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants and fluoride varnish in preventing dental decay.

Ivor Gordon Chestnutt, Barbara Lesley Chadwick, Simon Hutchings, Rebecca Playle, Timothy Pickles, Catherine Lisles, Nigel Kirkby, Maria Zeta Morgan, Lindsay Hunter, Ceri Hodell and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Fissure seal or fluoride varnish?Evidence-based dentistry · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ivor Gordon ChestnuttApplied Clinical Research and Public Health, Cardiff University School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XY, UK. chestnuttig@cardiff.ac.uk
Barbara Lesley Chadwick
Simon Hutchings
Rebecca Playle
Timothy Pickles
Catherine Lisles
Nigel Kirkby
Maria Zeta Morgan
Lindsay Hunter
Ceri Hodell
Beverely Withers
Simon Murphy
Sarah Morgan-Trimmer
Deborah Fitzsimmons
Ceri Phillips
Jacqueline Nuttall
Kerenza Hood
Cardiff University · GBSwansea University · GBCardiff and Vale University Health Board · GBWhitchurch Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health 08/104/04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDental caries remains a significant public health problem, prevalence being linked to social and economic deprivation. Occlusal surfaces of first permanent molars are the most susceptible site in the developing permanent dentition. Cochrane reviews have shown pit and fissure sealants (PFS) and fluoride varnish (FV) to be effective over no intervention in preventing caries. However, the comparative cost and effectiveness of these treatments is uncertain. The primary aim of the trial described in this protocol is to compare the clinical effectiveness of PFS and FV in preventing dental caries in first permanent molars in 6-7 year-olds. Secondary aims include: establishing the costs and the relative cost-effectiveness of PFS and FV delivered in a community/school setting; examining the impact of PFS and FV on children and their parents/carers in terms of quality of life/treatment acceptability measures; and examining the implementation of treatment in a community setting. METHODS/

designThe trial design comprises a randomised, assessor-blinded, two-arm, parallel group trial in 6-7 year old schoolchildren. Clinical procedures and assessments will be performed at 66 primary schools, in deprived areas in South Wales. Treatments will be delivered via a mobile dental clinic. In total, 920 children will be recruited (460 per trial arm). At baseline and annually for 36 months dental caries will be recorded using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) by trained and calibrated dentists. PFS and FV will be applied by trained dental hygienists. The FV will be applied at baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 months. The PFS will be applied at baseline and re-examined at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months, and will be re-applied if the existing sealant has become detached/is insufficient. The economic analysis will estimate the costs of providing the PFS versus FV. The process evaluation will assess implementation and acceptability through acceptability scales, a schools questionnaire and interviews with children, parents, dentists, dental nurses and school staff. The primary outcome measure will be the proportion of children developing new caries on any one of up to four treated first permanent molars. DISCUSSION: The objectives of this study have been identified by the National Institute for Health Research as one of importance to the National Health Service in the UK. The results of this trial will provide guidance on which of these technologies should be adopted for the prevention of dental decay in the most susceptible tooth-surface in the most at risk children. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: ISRCTN ref: ISRCTN17029222 EudraCT: 2010-023476-23 UKCRN ref: 9273.

Indexed as

Bisphenol A-Glycidyl MethacrylateCariostatic AgentsChildClinical ProtocolsCommunity DentistryCost-Benefit AnalysisDental CariesDMF IndexFemaleFluorides, TopicalHumansIncidenceInterviews as TopicLinear ModelsMaleMobile Health UnitsBisphenol A-Glycidyl MethacrylateCariostatic AgentsFluorides, TopicalPit and Fissure SealantsSodium Fluoridesodium fluoride topical preparation

Identifiers

PMID23167481
PMCPMC3534529
OpenAlexW2045632734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.