Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23167429›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2012

Should male circumcision be advocated for genital cancer prevention?

Brian J Morris, Adrian Mindel, Aaron Ar Tobian, Catherine A Hankins, Ronald H Gray, Robert C Bailey, Xavier Bosch, Alex D Wodak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Increased Risk of Penile Cancer among Men Working in AgricultureAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Brian J MorrisMolecular Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Australia. brian.morris@sydney.edu.au
Adrian Mindel
Aaron Ar Tobian
Catherine A Hankins
Ronald H Gray
Robert C Bailey
Xavier Bosch
Alex D Wodak
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Sydney · AUInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESSt Vincent's Hospital Sydney · AUUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

DevelopmentalP30AI082151 · NIAID · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LANDAY, ALAN L · 2009 to 2014
$4.6M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI082151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent policy statement by the Cancer Council of Australia on infant circumcision and cancer prevention and the announcement that the quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine will be made available for boys in Australia prompted us to provide an assessment of genital cancer prevention. While HPV vaccination of boys should help reduce anal cancer in homosexual men and cervical cancer in women, it will have little or no impact on penile or prostate cancer. Male circumcision can reduce cervical, penile and possibly prostate cancer. Promotion of both HPV vaccination and male circumcision will synergistically maximize genital cancer prevention.

Indexed as

Circumcision, MaleAustraliaFemaleHealth PolicyHumansMalePapillomavirus VaccinesPenile NeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID23167429
PMCPMC3668781
OpenAlexW2105368603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.