Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23166734›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

CD95 is part of a let-7/p53/miR-34 regulatory network.

Annika Hau, Paolo Ceppi, Marcus E Peter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. microRNA regulators of apoptosis in cancer.Discoveries (Craiova, Romania) · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. The role of CD95 and CD95 ligand in cancer.Cell death and differentiation · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mir-34: a new weapon against cancer?Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annika HauDivision Hematology/Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Paolo Ceppi
Marcus E Peter
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Novel Fas/CD95 Signaling MechanismsR01CA095319 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI PETER, MARCUS E. · 2002 to 2011
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The death receptor CD95 (APO-1/Fas) mediates apoptosis induction upon ligation by its cognate ligand CD95L. Two types of CD95 signaling pathways have been identified, which are characterized by the absence (Type I) or presence (Type II) of mitochondrial involvement. Micro(mi)RNAs are small noncoding RNAs that negatively regulate gene expression. They are important regulators of differentiation processes and are found frequently deregulated in many human cancers. We recently showed that Type I cells express less of the differentiation marker miRNA let-7 and, hence, likely represent more advanced tumor cells than the let-7 high expressing Type II cells. We have now identified miR-34a as a selective marker for cells that are sensitive to CD95-mediated apoptosis. Both CD95 and miR-34a are p53 target genes, and consequently, both the sensitivity of cancer cells to CD95-mediated apoptosis and the ability to respond to p53 mediated DNA genotoxic stress are linked. Interestingly, while miR-34a was found to positively correlate with the ability of cells to respond to genotoxic stress, let-7 was negatively correlated. The expression level of CD95 inversely correlated with the expression of let-7 suggesting regulation of let-7 expression by CD95. To test a link between p53 and miR-34a, we altered the expression of CD95. This affected the ability of cells to activate p53 and to regulate miR-34a. Our data point to a novel regulatory network comprising p53, CD95, let-7, and miR-34a that affects cancer cell survival, differentiation, and sensitivity to apoptotic signals. The possible relevance of this regulatory network for cancer stem cells is discussed.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksApoptosisCell Line, TumorDNA DamageEpistasis, Geneticfas ReceptorGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene SilencingHumansMicroRNAsSignal TransductionTranscription, GeneticTumor Suppressor Protein p53fas ReceptorMicroRNAsMIRN34 microRNA, humanmirnlet7 microRNA, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID23166734
PMCPMC3498227
OpenAlexW2018195928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.