Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23166696›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Macroevolutionary dynamics and historical biogeography of primate diversification inferred from a species supermatrix.

Mark S Springer, Robert W Meredith, John Gatesy, Christopher A Emerling, Jong Park, Daniel L Rabosky, Tanja Stadler, Cynthia Steiner, Oliver A Ryder, Jan E Janečka and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 135 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Revised Body Mass Estimates for Extinct Lemurs.American journal of biological anthropology · 2025
    Article
  11. The radiation and geographic expansion of primates through diverse climates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. The Earliest Known Radiation of Pitheciine Primates.American journal of primatology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Global primary predictors of extinction risk in primates.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. The origins of musicality in the motion of primates.American journal of biological anthropology · 2024
    Article

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mark S SpringerDepartment of Biology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, United States of America. mark.springer@ucr.edu
Robert W Meredith
John Gatesy
Christopher A Emerling
Jong Park
Daniel L Rabosky
Tanja Stadler
Cynthia Steiner
Oliver A Ryder
Jan E Janečka
Colleen A Fisher
William J Murphy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogenetic relationships, divergence times, and patterns of biogeographic descent among primate species are both complex and contentious. Here, we generate a robust molecular phylogeny for 70 primate genera and 367 primate species based on a concatenation of 69 nuclear gene segments and ten mitochondrial gene sequences, most of which were extracted from GenBank. Relaxed clock analyses of divergence times with 14 fossil-calibrated nodes suggest that living Primates last shared a common ancestor 71-63 Ma, and that divergences within both Strepsirrhini and Haplorhini are entirely post-Cretaceous. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction of non-avian dinosaurs played an important role in the diversification of placental mammals. Previous queries into primate historical biogeography have suggested Africa, Asia, Europe, or North America as the ancestral area of crown primates, but were based on methods that were coopted from phylogeny reconstruction. By contrast, we analyzed our molecular phylogeny with two methods that were developed explicitly for ancestral area reconstruction, and find support for the hypothesis that the most recent common ancestor of living Primates resided in Asia. Analyses of primate macroevolutionary dynamics provide support for a diversification rate increase in the late Miocene, possibly in response to elevated global mean temperatures, and are consistent with the fossil record. By contrast, diversification analyses failed to detect evidence for rate-shift changes near the Eocene-Oligocene boundary even though the fossil record provides clear evidence for a major turnover event ("Grande Coupure") at this time. Our results highlight the power and limitations of inferring diversification dynamics from molecular phylogenies, as well as the sensitivity of diversification analyses to different species concepts.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEvolution, MolecularAnimalsDNA, MitochondrialPhylogenyPhylogeographyPrimatesDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID23166696
PMCPMC3500307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.