Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23166645›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Random coil to globular thermal response of a protein (H3.1) with three knowledge-based coarse-grained potentials.

Ras B Pandey, Barry L Farmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ras B PandeyDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, Missouri, USA. ras.pandey@usm.edu
Barry L Farmer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of temperature on the conformation of a histone (H3.1) is studied by a coarse-grained Monte Carlo simulation based on three knowledge-based contact potentials (MJ, BT, BFKV). Despite unique energy and mobility profiles of its residues, the histone H3.1 undergoes a systematic (possibly continuous) structural transition from a random coil to a globular conformation on reducing the temperature. The range over which such a systematic response in variation of the radius of gyration (R(g)) with the temperature (T) occurs, however, depends on the potential, i.e. ΔT(MJ) ≈ 0.013-0.020, ΔT(BT) ≈ 0.018-0.026, and ΔT(BFKV) ≈ 0.006-0.013 (in reduced unit). Unlike MJ and BT potentials, results from the BFKV potential show an anomaly where the magnitude of R(g) decreases on raising the temperature in a range ΔT(A) ≈ 0.015-0.018 before reaching its steady-state random coil configuration. Scaling of the structure factor, S(q) ∝ q(-1/ν), with the wave vector, q=2π/λ, and the wavelength, λ, reveals a systematic change in the effective dimension (D(e)∼1/ν) of the histone with all potentials (MJ, BT, BFKV): D(e)∼3 in the globular structure with D(e)∼2 for the random coil. Reproducibility of the general yet unique (monotonic) structural transition of the protein H3.1 with the temperature (in contrast to non-monotonic structural response of a similar but different protein H2AX) with three interaction sets shows that the knowledge-based contact potential is viable tool to investigate structural response of proteins. Caution should be exercise with the quantitative comparisons due to differences in transition regimes with these interactions.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationTemperatureHistonesMonte Carlo MethodHistones

Identifiers

PMID23166645
PMCPMC3498164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.