ArticlePloS one2012
Deep sequencing reveals differences in the transcriptional landscapes of fibers from two cultivated species of cotton.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative multi "omics" profiling ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Transcriptome, Ectopic Expression and Genetic Population Analysis Identify Candidate Genes for Fiber Quality Improvement in Cotton.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Transcriptome Time-Course Analysis in the Whole Period of Cotton Fiber Development.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Differentially expressed genes between two groups of backcross inbred lines differing in fiber length developed from Upland × Pima cotton.Molecular biology reports · 2019Article
- Transcriptomic profiling of developing fiber in levant cotton (Gossypium herbaceum L.).Functional & integrative genomics · 2018Article
- Article
- Identification of candidate genes for fiber length quantitative trait loci through RNA-Seq and linkage and physical mapping in cotton.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Insights Into Upland Cotton (Genomics insights · 2017Article
- A comparative transcriptome analysis of two sets of backcross inbred lines differing in lint-yield derived from a Gossypium hirsutum × Gossypium barbadense population.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2016Article
- SNP Marker Discovery in Pima Cotton (Genomics insights · 2016Article
- Genome-Wide SNP Linkage Mapping and QTL Analysis for Fiber Quality and Yield Traits in the Upland Cotton Recombinant Inbred Lines Population.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Article
- Metabolomic and transcriptomic insights into how cotton fiber transitions to secondary wall synthesis, represses lignification, and prolongs elongation.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Article
- Development of a 63K SNP Array for Cotton and High-Density Mapping of Intraspecific and Interspecific Populations of Gossypium spp.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2015Article
- SNP discovery in complex allotetraploid genomes (Gossypium spp., Malvaceae) using genotyping by sequencing.Applications in plant sciences · 2015Article
- Genome-wide investigation and transcriptome analysis of the WRKY gene family in Gossypium.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2015Article
- Development of EST-based SNP and InDel markers and their utilization in tetraploid cotton genetic mapping.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- The Li2 mutation results in reduced subgenome expression bias in elongating fibers of allotetraploid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.).PloS one · 2014Article
- Comparative evolutionary and developmental dynamics of the cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) fiber transcriptome.PLoS genetics · 2014Article
- Understanding the relationship between cotton fiber properties and non-cellulosic cell wall polysaccharides.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cotton (Gossypium) fiber is the most prevalent natural product used in the textile industry. The two major cultivated species, G. hirsutum (Gh) and G. barbadense (Gb), are allotetraploids with contrasting fiber quality properties. To better understand the molecular basis for their fiber differences, EST pyrosequencing was used to document the fiber transcriptomes at two key development stages, 10 days post anthesis (dpa), representing the peak of fiber elongation, and 22 dpa, representing the transition to secondary cell wall synthesis. The 617,000 high quality reads (89% of the total 692,000 reads) from 4 libraries were assembled into 46,072 unigenes, comprising 38,297 contigs and 7,775 singletons. Functional annotation of the unigenes together with comparative digital gene expression (DGE) revealed a diverse set of functions and processes that were partly linked to specific fiber stages. Globally, 2,770 contigs (7%) showed differential expression (>2-fold) between 10 and 22 dpa (irrespective of genotype), with 70% more highly expressed at 10 dpa, while 2,248 (6%) were differentially expressed between the genotypes (irrespective of stage). The most significant genes with differential DGE at 10 dpa included expansins and lipid transfer proteins (higher in Gb), while at 22 dpa tubulins, cellulose, and sucrose synthases showed higher expression in Gb. DGE was compared with expression data of 10 dpa-old fibers from Affymetrix microarrays. Among 543 contigs showing differential expression on both platforms, 74% were consistent in being either over-expressed in Gh (242 genes) or in Gb (161 genes). Furthermore, the unigene set served to identify 339 new SSRs and close to 21,000 inter-genotypic SNPs. Subsets of 88 SSRs and 48 SNPs were validated through mapping and added 65 new loci to a RIL genetic map. The new set of fiber ESTs and the gene-based markers complement existing available resources useful in basic and applied research for crop improvement in cotton.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.