Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23166396›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2013

Stem cell therapy: an exercise in patience and prudence.

Huan-Ting Lin, Makoto Otsu, Hiromitsu Nakauchi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Total Body Irradiation and Risk of Diabetes Mellitus; A Meta-AnalysisAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Opportunities and challenges in stem cell therapy in cardiovascular diseases: Position standing in 2022.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Duchenne muscular dystrophy: current cell therapies.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2015
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Adult stem cells and cardiac regeneration.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2013
    Article
  19. Mammalian epigenetics in biology and medicine.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Huan-Ting LinCenter for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, IMSUT, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8639, Japan.
Makoto Otsu
Hiromitsu Nakauchi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent times, the epigenetic study of pluripotency based on cellular reprogramming techniques led to the creation of induced pluripotent stem cells. It has come to represent the forefront of a new wave of alternative therapeutic approaches in the field of stem cell therapy. Progress in drug development has saved countless lives, but there are numerous intractable diseases where curative treatment cannot be achieved through pharmacological intervention alone. Consequently, there has been an unfortunate rise in incidences of organ failures, degenerative disorders and cancers, hence novel therapeutic interventions are required. Stem cells have unique self-renewal and multilineage differentiation capabilities that could be harnessed for therapeutic purposes. Although a number of mature differentiated cells have been characterized in vitro, few have been demonstrated to function in a physiologically relevant context. Despite fervent levels of enthusiasm in the field, the reality is that other than the employment of haematopoietic stem cells, many other therapies have yet to be thoroughly proven for their therapeutic benefit and safety in application. This review shall focus on a discussion regarding the current status of stem cell therapy, the issues surrounding it and its future prospects with a general background on the regulatory networks underlying pluripotency.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCellular ReprogrammingRegenerationAnimalsBlastocystCell LineageCentral Nervous System DiseasesDiabetes MellitusEmbryonic Stem CellsEpithelial CellsHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem CellsNeural Stem CellsPancreas

Identifiers

PMID23166396
PMCPMC3539361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.