Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23166342›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2012

Predictors of persistence after a positive depression screen among adolescents.

Laura P Richardson, Elizabeth McCauley, Carolyn A McCarty, David C Grossman, Mon Myaing, Chuan Zhou, Julie Richards, Carol Rockhill, Wayne Katon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Twelve-Month Outcomes of a Randomized Trial of the Positive Thoughts and Action Program for Depression Among Early Adolescents.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2016
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. A randomized trial of the Positive Thoughts and Action program for depression among early adolescents.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53 · 2013
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laura P RichardsonDepartments of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98121, USA. laura.richardson@seattlechildrens.org
Elizabeth McCauley
Carolyn A McCarty
David C Grossman
Mon Myaing
Chuan Zhou
Julie Richards
Carol Rockhill
Wayne Katon

Funding

Improve Primary Care Management of Adolescent DepressionK23MH069814 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RICHARDSON, LAURA P · 2004 to 2008
$770k
NIMH NIH HHS 5K23 MH069814NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH069814
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine predictors of depression persistence after a positive screening test to inform management protocols for screened youth.

methodsWe conducted a cohort study of 444 youth (aged 13-17 years) from a large health care delivery system. Youth with depressive symptoms, based on a 2-item depression screen, were oversampled for the baseline interview. Baseline assessments included the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item (PHQ-9) depression screen as well as clinical factors that were hypothesized to influence depression persistence (family history of depression, functional impairment, perceived social support, anxiety symptoms, externalizing symptoms, and medical comorbidity). Logistic regression analysis was used to examine factors associated with the persistence of depression at 6 months postbaseline.

resultsOf 113 youth with a positive baseline screen (PHQ-9 ≥11), 47% and 35% continued to be positive at 6-week and 6-month follow-up, respectively. After controlling for treatment status, only 2 factors were significantly associated with depression persistence at 6 months: baseline depressive symptom score and continuing to have a positive screen at 6 weeks. For each 1-point increase on the PHQ-9 score at baseline, youth had a 16% increased odds of continuing to be depressed at 6 months (odds ratio: 1.16, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.34). Youth who continued to screen positive 6 weeks later had almost 3 times the odds of being depressed at 6 months (odds ratio: 2.89, 95% confidence interval: 1.09-7.61).

conclusionsDepressive symptom severity at presentation and continued symptoms at 6 weeks postscreening are the strongest predictors of depression persistence. Patients with high depressive symptom scores and continued symptoms at 6 weeks should receive active treatment.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningAdolescentChronic DiseaseCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDepressive DisorderFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePrimary Health CareRemission, SpontaneousRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesWashingtonWatchful Waiting

Identifiers

PMID23166342
PMCPMC3507250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.