Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23165916›Full record

ArticleChembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology2012

Programming in situ immunofluorescence intensities through interchangeable reactions of dynamic DNA complexes.

Jan Zimak, Ryan M Schweller, Dzifa Y Duose, Walter N Hittelman, Michael R Diehl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. New Technologies to Image Tumors.Cancer treatment and research · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Immunohistochemistry and mass spectrometry for highly multiplexed cellular molecular imaging.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jan ZimakDepartments of Bioengineering and Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Ryan M Schweller
Dzifa Y Duose
Walter N Hittelman
Michael R Diehl
Rice University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Multiplexed Reiterative Immunofluorescence Analyses via Engineered DNA CircuitryR21CA147912 · NCI · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI DIEHL, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2012
$627k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA147912PHS HHS 1R21A147912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The regulation of antibody reporting intensities is critical to various in situ fluorescence-imaging analyses. Although such control is often necessary to visualize sparse molecular targets, the ability to tune marker intensities is also essential for highly multiplexed imaging strategies in which marker reporting levels must be tuned both to optimize dynamic detection ranges and to minimize crosstalk between different signals. Existing chemical amplification approaches generally lack such control. Here, we demonstrate that linear and branched DNA complexes can be designed to function as interchangeable building blocks that can be assembled into organized, fluorescence-reporting complexes. We show that the ability to program DNA-strand-displacement reactions between these complexes offers new opportunities to deterministically tune the number of dyes that are coupled to individual antibodies in order both to increase and controllably balance marker reporting levels within fixed cells.

Indexed as

DNAFluorescent Antibody TechniqueStathminDNAStathmin

Identifiers

PMID23165916
PMCPMC3715551
OpenAlexW2021199040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.