Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23165278›Full record

ArticleAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges2013

Policies, activities, and structures supporting research mentoring: a national survey of academic health centers with clinical and translational science awards.

Robert E Tillman, Susan Jang, Zainab Abedin, Boyd F Richards, Brigitta Spaeth-Rublee, Harold Alan Pincus

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Promoting mentorship in translational research: should we hope for Athena or train mentor?Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2014
    Trial
  2. Training mentors of clinical and translational research scholars: a randomized controlled trial.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2014
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Measuring organizational mentoring climate: Importance and availability scales.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Independent investigator incubator (IBMC medical education · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert E TillmanOffice of Faculty Professional Development, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Susan Jang
Zainab Abedin
Boyd F Richards
Brigitta Spaeth-Rublee
Harold Alan Pincus
Columbia University · US

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024156 · NCRR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GINSBERG, HENRY N · 2006 to 2011
$53.0M
Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000040 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GINSBERG, HENRY N · 2012 to 2015
$26.2M
PRIMING THE PUMP: TRAINING PHYSICIAN-SCIENTISTS IN TRANSLATIONAL PSYCHIATRYR25MH086466 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI Melissa Arbuckle, Eduardo David Leonardo · 2009 to 2026
$4.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000040NCRR NIH HHS 3UL1RR024156-04S3NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024156NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH086466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo document the frequency of policies and activities in support of mentoring practices at institutions receiving a U.S. National Institutes of Health's Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA).

methodThe study consisted of a 69-item survey with questions about the inclusion (formal or informal) of policies, activities, and structures supporting mentoring within CTSA-sponsored research (i.e., KL2 programs) and, more broadly, in the CTSA's home institution. The survey, conducted from November 2010 through January 2011, was sent to the 55 institutions awarded CTSAs at the time of the survey. Follow-up phone interviews were conducted to clarify responses as needed.

resultsFifty-one of 55 (92%) institutions completed the survey for institutional programs and 53 of 55 (96%) for KL2 programs. Responses regarding policies and activities involving mentor criteria, mentor-mentee relationship, incentives, and evaluative mechanisms revealed considerable variability between KL2 and institutional programs in some areas, such as having mentor qualification criteria and processes to evaluate mentors. The survey also identified areas, such as training and women and minority mentoring programs, where there was frequent sharing of activities between the institutional and KL2 programs.

conclusionsKL2 programs and institutional programs tend to have different preferences for policies versus activities to optimize qualification of mentors, the mentor-mentee relationship, incentives, and evaluation mechanisms. Frequently, these elements are informal. Individuals in charge of implementing and maintaining mentoring initiatives can use the results of the study to consider their current mentoring policies, structures, and activities by comparing them with national patterns within CTSA institutions.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersOrganizational PolicyCommunicationFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMentorsMinority GroupsNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Surveys and QuestionnairesTranslational Research, BiomedicalUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23165278
PMCPMC3529987
OpenAlexW2032102883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.