Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23165260›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2012

Encoding asymmetry within neural circuits.

Miguel L Concha, Isaac H Bianco, Stephen W Wilson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Mapping cortical brain asymmetry in 17,141 healthy individuals worldwide via the ENIGMA Consortium.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The insular cortex, autonomic asymmetry and cardiovascular control: looking at the right side of stroke.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Laterality in the Damaraland Mole-Rat: Insights from a Eusocial Mammal.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Conserved and diverged asymmetric gene expression in the brain of teleosts.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miguel L ConchaBiomedical Neuroscience Institute, University of Chile, Independencia 1027, Santiago 8380453, Chile. mconcha@med. uchile.cl
Isaac H Bianco
Stephen W Wilson

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical InstituteWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic and environmental factors control morphological and functional differences between the two sides of the nervous system. Neural asymmetries are proposed to have important roles in circuit physiology, cognition and species-specific behaviours. We propose two fundamentally different mechanisms for encoding left-right asymmetry in neural circuits. In the first, asymmetric circuits share common components; in the second, there are unique unilateral structures. Research in both vertebrates and invertebrates is helping to reveal the mechanisms underlying the development of neural lateralization, but less is known about the function of circuit asymmetries. Technical advances in the coming years are likely to revolutionize our understanding of left-right asymmetry in the nervous system.

Indexed as

AnimalsCognitionFunctional LateralityHumansNerve NetNervous SystemSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID23165260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.