ArticleVeterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2013
Relationship between airborne detection of influenza A virus and the number of infected pigs.
Article in Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reassortment incompetent live attenuated and replicon influenza vaccines provide improved protection against influenza in piglets.NPJ vaccines · 2024Article
- Immune Responses and Pathogenesis following Experimental SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Domestic Cats.Viruses · 2023Article
- The epidemiology of swine influenza.Animal diseases · 2021Review
- Comparison of samplers collecting airborne influenza viruses: 1. Primarily impingers and cyclones.PloS one · 2021Article
- A Comparative Study of Associated Microbiota Between Pig Farm and Pig Slaughterhouse in Guangdong, China.Current microbiology · 2020Article
- Prospective surveillance for influenza. virus in Chinese swine farms.Emerging microbes & infections · 2018Article
- Detection of influenza A virus in aerosols of vaccinated and non-vaccinated pigs in a warm environment.PloS one · 2018Article
- The Use of Bioaerosol Sampling for Airborne Virus Surveillance in Swine Production Facilities: A Mini Review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2017Review
- Maternally-derived antibodies do not prevent transmission of swine influenza A virus between pigs.Veterinary research · 2016Article
- Bioaerosol Sampling in Modern Agriculture: A Novel Approach for Emerging Pathogen Surveillance?The Journal of infectious diseases · 2016Article
- Bioaerosol sampling: sampling mechanisms, bioefficiency and field studies.The Journal of hospital infection · 2016Review
- Airborne Influenza A Is Detected in the Personal Breathing Zone of Swine Veterinarians.PloS one · 2016Article
- Molecular epidemiology of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus among humans and swine, Sri Lanka.Emerging infectious diseases · 2014Article
- Evidence of infectivity of airborne porcine epidemic diarrhea virus and detection of airborne viral RNA at long distances from infected herds.Veterinary research · 2014Article
- Epidemic status of Swine influenza virus in china.Indian journal of microbiology · 2014Review
- Influenza virus aerosols in the air and their infectiousness.Advances in virology · 2014Review
- Article
- Evaluation of an electrostatic particle ionization technology for decreasing airborne pathogens in pigs.AerobiologiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Influenza A virus infects a wide range of species including both birds and mammals (including humans). One of the key routes by which the virus can infect populations of animals is by aerosol transmission. This study explored the relationship between number of infected pigs and the probability of detecting influenza virus RNA in bioaerosols through the course of an acute infection. Bioaerosols were collected using a cyclonic collector in two groups of 7 week-old pigs that were experimentally infected by exposure with a contact infected pig (seeder pig). After contact exposure, individual pig nasal swab samples were collected daily and air samples were collected three times per day for 8 days. All samples were tested for influenza by real-time reverse transcriptase (RRT)-PCR targeting the influenza virus matrix gene. All pigs' nasal swabs became influenza virus RRT-PCR positive upon exposure to the infected seeder pig. Airborne influenza was detected in 28/43 (65%) air samples. The temporal dynamics of influenza virus detection in air samples was in close agreement with the nasal shedding pattern in the infected pigs. First detection of positive bioaerosols happened at 1 day post contact (DPC). Positive bioaerosols were consistently detected between 3 and 6 DPC, a time when most pigs were also shedding virus in nasal secretions. Overall, the odds of detecting a positive air sample increased 2.2 times for every additional nasal swab positive pig in the group. In summary, there was a strong relationship between the number of pigs shedding influenza virus in nasal secretions and the generation of bioaerosols during the course of an acute infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.