ArticleBMC health services research2012
Quality of outpatient clinical notes: a stakeholder definition derived through qualitative research.
Article in BMC health services research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Notes Contain Limited Documentation of Shared Decision Making for Colorectal Cancer Screening Decisions.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025Trial
- Smarter Documentation: Measuring and Improving the Quality of Progress Notes Written by Hospitalists.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Trial
- An electronic documentation system improves the quality of admission notes: a randomized trial.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Trial
- Application of digital simulations for clinical assessment and documentation of temporomandibular disorders: a retrospective study.Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology · 2026Article
- AI-assisted assessment of narrative documentation quality in ART consultations using a domain-based framework.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Japanese Clinical Note Styles Between Physicians and Large Language Models Using Identical Psychiatric Cases: Quantitative Text Analysis.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Protecting medical privacy with pretrained language models: named entity recognition-based de-identification in Korean unstructured electronic medical records.npj health systems · 2025Article
- Evaluating Hospital Course Summarization by an Electronic Health Record-Based Large Language Model.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Assessing Physician and Patient Agreement on Whether Patient Outcomes Captured in Clinical Progress Notes Reflect Treatment Success: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2025Article
- Publications Are More Than Lines on Your Curriculum Vitae: An Epistle to Residents (and Faculty).Cureus · 2025Article
- Using artificial intelligence to develop a measure of orthopaedic treatment success from clinical notes.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- A Hospital Medical Record Quality Scoring Tool (MeReQ): Development, Validation, and Results of a Pilot Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- An evaluation of staff experiences of the Royal Literary Fund writer-in-residence service to support improvements in written communication in healthcare.Qualitative research in medicine & healthcare · 2023Article
- Time to Put Down the Phone-A Case for Structured Data Entry.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2023Article
- Assessing the Assessment-Developing and Deploying a Novel Tool for Evaluating Clinical Notes' Diagnostic Assessment Quality.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- The Impact of Structured and Standardized Documentation on Documentation Quality; a Multicenter, Retrospective Study.Journal of medical systems · 2022Article
- Medical Record Documentation About Opioid Tapering: Examining Benefit-to-Harm Framework and Patient Engagement.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2020Article
- Evaluation of an advanced practice provider emergency department critical care step-down unit.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2020Article
- The effectiveness of a bundled intervention to improve resident progress notes in an electronic health record.Journal of hospital medicine · 2015Article
- Aberrant drug-related behaviors: a qualitative analysis of medical record documentation in patients referred to an HIV/chronic pain clinic.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are no empirically-grounded criteria or tools to define or benchmark the quality of outpatient clinical documentation. Outpatient clinical notes document care, communicate treatment plans and support patient safety, medical education, medico-legal investigations and reimbursement. Accurately describing and assessing quality of clinical documentation is a necessary improvement in an increasingly team-based healthcare delivery system. In this paper we describe the quality of outpatient clinical notes from the perspective of multiple stakeholders.
methodsUsing purposeful sampling for maximum diversity, we conducted focus groups and individual interviews with clinicians, nursing and ancillary staff, patients, and healthcare administrators at six federal health care facilities between 2009 and 2011. All sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed and qualitatively analyzed using open, axial and selective coding.
resultsThe 163 participants included 61 clinicians, 52 nurse/ancillary staff, 31 patients and 19 administrative staff. Three organizing themes emerged: 1) characteristics of quality in clinical notes, 2) desired elements within the clinical notes and 3) system supports to improve the quality of clinical notes. We identified 11 codes to describe characteristics of clinical notes, 20 codes to describe desired elements in quality clinical notes and 11 codes to describe clinical system elements that support quality when writing clinical notes. While there was substantial overlap between the aspects of quality described by the four stakeholder groups, only clinicians and administrators identified ease of translation into billing codes as an important characteristic of a quality note. Only patients rated prioritization of their medical problems as an aspect of quality. Nurses included care and education delivered to the patient, information added by the patient, interdisciplinary information, and infection alerts as important content.
conclusionsPerspectives of these four stakeholder groups provide a comprehensive description of quality in outpatient clinical documentation. The resulting description of characteristics and content necessary for quality notes provides a research-based foundation for assessing the quality of clinical documentation in outpatient health care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.