Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23164244›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2012

Managing symptoms during cancer treatments: evaluating the implementation of evidence-informed remote support protocols.

Dawn Stacey, Debra Bakker, Barbara Ballantyne, Kimberly Chapman, Joanne Cumminger, Esther Green, Margaret Harrison, Doris Howell, Craig Kuziemsky, Terry MacKenzie and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Distress screening and supportive care referrals used by telephone-based health services: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Patient and family experiences with accessing telephone cancer treatment symptom support: a descriptive study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  10. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2016
    Article
  11. Triaging symptom calls with and without practice guides: A case exemplar.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2016
    Article
  12. Cognitive interviewing of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Dawn StaceySchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. dstacey@uottawa.ca
Debra Bakker
Barbara Ballantyne
Kimberly Chapman
Joanne Cumminger
Esther Green
Margaret Harrison
Doris Howell
Craig Kuziemsky
Terry MacKenzie
Brenda Sabo
Myriam Skrutkowski
Ann Syme
Angela Whynot
University of Ottawa · CACanadian Partnership Against Cancer · CACancer Care Ontario · CACapital District Health Authority · CADalhousie University · CAHealth Sciences North · CAHorizon Health Network · CALaurentian University · CAMontreal General Hospital · CANova Scotia Health Authority · CAQueen's University · CASudbury Regional Hospital · CAUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement of cancer treatment-related symptoms is an important safety issue given that symptoms can become life-threatening and often occur when patients are at home. With funding from the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, a pan-Canadian steering committee was established with representation from eight provinces to develop symptom protocols using a rigorous methodology (CAN-IMPLEMENT©). Each protocol is based on a systematic review of the literature to identify relevant clinical practice guidelines. Protocols were validated by cancer nurses from across Canada. The aim of this study is to build an effective and sustainable approach for implementing evidence-informed protocols for nurses to use when providing remote symptom assessment, triage, and guidance in self-management for patients experiencing symptoms while undergoing cancer treatments.

methodsA prospective mixed-methods study design will be used. Guided by the Knowledge to Action Framework, the study will involve (a) establishing an advisory knowledge user team in each of three targeted settings; (b) assessing factors influencing nurses' use of protocols using interviews/focus groups and a standardized survey instrument; (c) adapting protocols for local use, ensuring fidelity of the content; (d) selecting intervention strategies to overcome known barriers and implementing the protocols; (e) conducting think-aloud usability testing; (f) evaluating protocol use and outcomes by conducting an audit of 100 randomly selected charts at each of the three settings; and (g) assessing satisfaction with remote support using symptom protocols and change in nurses' barriers to use using survey instruments. The primary outcome is sustained use of the protocols, defined as use in 75% of the calls. Descriptive analysis will be conducted for the barriers, use of protocols, and chart audit outcomes. Content analysis will be conducted on interviews/focus groups and usability testing with comparisons across settings. DISCUSSION: Given the importance of patient safety, patient-centered care, and delivery of quality services, learning how to effectively implement evidence-informed symptom protocols in oncology healthcare services is essential for ensuring safe, consistent, and effective care for individuals with cancer. This study is likely to have a significant contribution to the delivery of remote oncology services, as well as influence symptom management by patients at home.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsNursesAntineoplastic AgentsCanadaEvidence-Based MedicineGuideline AdherenceHumansPatient-Centered CarePractice Guidelines as TopicTelemedicineAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID23164244
PMCPMC3527220
OpenAlexW2109037336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.