SynthesisImplementation science : IS2012
Strategies for monitoring and updating clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Implementation science : IS, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- High-flow nasal cannula for lower respiratory infections in children under 2 years: a systematic review of indications.Archives of disease in childhood · 2026Pooled it
- Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines and position statements on vital pulp therapy: a systematic review.Evidence-based dentistry · 2025Pooled it
- Do stroke clinical practice guideline recommendations for the intervention of thickened liquids for aspiration support evidence based decision making? A systematic review and narrative synthesis.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2020Pooled it
- Clinical guidelines for postpartum women and infants in primary care-a systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2014Pooled it
- Guidance for updating clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review of methodological handbooks.Implementation science : IS · 2014Pooled it
- Planning a Clinical Practice Guideline Revision for a Core Set of Outcome Measures in Adults Undergoing Neurologic Physical Therapy, Part 2: Determining Stakeholders' Uptake and Recommendations.Clinical and public health guidelines · 2026Article
- Developing Evidence-Based Implementation Strategies for the Management of Women With Early Pregnancy Bleeding in the Emergency Department: A Multi-Method Study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Article
- Update of the clinical guideline for hypertension diagnosis and treatment in Iran.Clinical hypertension · 2024Article
- Designing tailored maintenance strategies for systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines using the Portfolio Maintenance by Test-Treatment (POMBYTT) framework.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Review
- Efficiency based updating of evidence based surgical guidelines - Experiences from a multidisciplinary guideline upon Minimally Invasive Surgery.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2023Article
- The Development of Recommendations for Healthcare Providers to Support Patients Experiencing Medication Self-Management Problems.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the evidence for self-management post-stroke within clinical practice guidelines for people with stroke: A systematic review.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2022Review
- Optimizing a literature surveillance strategy to retrieve sound overall prognosis and risk assessment model papers.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- Developing and applying a 'living guidelines' approach to WHO recommendations on maternal and perinatal health.BMJ global health · 2019Review
- Article
- Updated clinical guidelines experience major reporting limitations.Implementation science : IS · 2017Article
- Development of a prioritisation tool for the updating of clinical guideline questions: the UpPriority Tool protocol.BMJ open · 2017Article
- Continuous surveillance of a pregnancy clinical guideline: an early experience.Systematic reviews · 2017Article
- Reporting Items for Updated Clinical Guidelines: Checklist for the Reporting of Updated Guidelines (CheckUp).PLoS medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundScientific knowledge is in constant change. The flow of new information requires a frequent re-evaluation of the available research results. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are not exempted from this phenomenon and need to be kept updated to maintain the validity of their recommendations. The objective of our review is to systematically identify, describe and assess strategies for monitoring and updating CPGs. STUDY DESIGN AND
settingWe conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating one or more methods of updating (with or without monitoring) CPGs or recommendations. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed) and The Cochrane Methodology Register (The Cochrane Library) from 1966 to June 2012. Additionally, we hand-searched reference lists of the included studies and the Guidelines International Network book of abstracts. If necessary, we contacted study authors to obtain additional information.
resultsWe included a total of eight studies. Four evaluated if CPGs were out of date, three updated CPGs, and one continuously monitored and updated CPGs. The most detailed reported phase of the process was the identification of new evidence. As opposed to studies updating guidelines, studies evaluating if CPGs were out of date applied restricted searches. Only one study compared a restricted versus an exhaustive search suggesting that a restricted search is sufficient to assess recommendations' Validity. One study analyzed the survival time of CPGs and suggested that these should be reassessed every three years.
conclusionsThere is limited evidence about the optimal strategies for monitoring and updating clinical practice guidelines. A restricted search is likely to be sufficient to monitor new evidence and assess the need to update, however, more information is needed about the timing and type of search. Only the exhaustive search strategy has been assessed for the update of CPGs. The development and evaluation of more efficient strategies is needed to improve the timeliness and reduce the burden of maintaining the validity of CPGs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.