ReviewClinics in perinatology2012
Optimal timing for clamping the umbilical cord after birth.
Review in Clinics in perinatology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early or delayed cord clamping during transition of term newborns: does it make any difference in cerebral tissue oxygenation?Italian journal of pediatrics · 2024Trial
- Early versus delayed umbilical cord clamping in infants with congenital heart disease: a pilot, randomized, controlled trial.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2015Trial
- Comparison of the Effects of Early Versus Delayed Cord Clamping on Haemoglobin Levels in Neonates Delivered at Term.Cureus · 2024Article
- Physiological-Based Cord Clamping: When the Baby Is Ready for Clamping.Neonatology · 2024Review
- The Short and Long Term Consequences of Delayed Cord Clamping on Late Pre-Term Infants.International journal of women's health · 2023Article
- Does placental abruption cause neonatal anemia?Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2022Article
- A clinical study of fetal outcome following early and delayed cord clamping in births associated with anemia in pregnancy.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022Article
- Early versus delayed umbilical cord clamping on maternal and neonatal outcomes.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2019Review
- Review
- Italian Recommendations for Placental Transfusion Strategies.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2018Review
- Efficacy of Supplementation with Iron Sulfate Compared to Iron Bisglycinate Chelate in Preterm Infants.Current pediatric reviews · 2018Observational
- Golden hour of neonatal life: Need of the hour.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2017Review
- Resuscitation of extremely preterm infants - controversies and current evidence.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2016Review
- Neonatal resuscitation: evolving strategies.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2015Article
- Observational
- Time course study of blood pressure in term and preterm infants immediately after birth.PloS one · 2014Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article provides a brief overview of pros and cons of clamping the cord too early (within seconds) after birth. It also highlights evolving data that suggest that delaying cord clamping for 30 to 60 seconds after birth is beneficial to the baby, with no measurable negative effects either the baby or the mother.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.