ArticleOncology letters2012
Synovial sarcoma arising in the vulva cytogenetically confirmed by SYT break-apart rearrangement fluorescence in situ hybridization: A case report and discussion of diagnostic methods.
Article in Oncology letters, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synovial sarcoma of female urethra: a case report and review of the literature.Diagnostic pathology · 2023Review
- Primary hepatic sarcomatoid carcinoma: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a soft tissue sarcoma of unknown histogenesis that rarely occurs in the female genital tract. We report a case of SS occurring in the right vulva of a young Japanese female. The tumor was composed of poorly differentiated rounded cell areas, surrounded by fibroblastic spindle-shaped cell areas. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were focally positive for cytokeratin, vimentin, CD99, Bcl-2 and neuron-specific enolase. The tumor was suspected, but was difficult to confirm as it was an SS based solely on light-microscopic and immunohistochemical findings. Although reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) failed to detect SS-specific SYT-SSX fusion gene transcripts using an RNA sample extracted from the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue, SYT break-apart rearrangement fluorescence in situ hybridization (SYT bar-FISH) successfully confirmed our diagnosis of SS for the tumor. Thus, SYT bar-FISH may be more suitable for the purpose of the molecular diagnosis of SS than conventional RT-PCR when using archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue specimens.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.