Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23162616›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2012

Outcomes of palliative bowel surgery for malignant bowel obstruction in patients with gynecological malignancy.

Tomoko Goto, Masashi Takano, Tadashi Aoyama, Morikazu Miyamoto, Akio Watanabe, Masafumi Kato, Naoki Sasaki, Junko Hirata, Hidenori Sasa, Kenichi Furuya

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03260647 (Risk Stratified Multidisciplinary Ambulatory Management of Malignant Bowel Obstruction), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03260647 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Risk Stratified Multidisciplinary Ambulatory Management of Malignant Bowel Obstruction (MAMBO) Program for Women With Advanced Gynecological Cancers

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2017 to 2024Enrolled96ConditionsGynecologic CancerArmsManagement algorithm for Malignant Bowel Obstruction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Treatment Patterns, Outcomes, and Costs for Bowel Obstruction in Ovarian Cancer.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2017
    Article
  11. Palliative care in patients with ovarian cancer and bowel obstruction.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tomoko GotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College, Saitama 359-8513, Japan.
Masashi Takano
Tadashi Aoyama
Morikazu Miyamoto
Akio Watanabe
Masafumi Kato
Naoki Sasaki
Junko Hirata
Hidenori Sasa
Kenichi Furuya

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with a gynecological malignancy who received palliative care with and without surgical procedures for malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) and to explore prognostic factors to aid the selection of patients who would benefit from palliative surgery. Medical records of patients with MBO due to a gynecological malignancy treated at our institute between 2005 and 2010 were reviewed. Successful palliation following surgery was defined as the ability to tolerate solid food for at least 60 days. Clinical variables were analyzed using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. A total of 53 cases were identified; 20 had bowel surgery for MBO as a palliative procedure and 33 did not. Colostomy was performed in 11 (55%) of 20 patients and ileostomy was performed in 7 (35%). The postoperative morbidity was 35% and mortality within 30 days was 5%. Successful palliation following surgery was achieved in 14 (70%) of 20 cases with a median period of 146 days (range, 61-294). Survival following the diagnosis of MBO was longer in cases with surgery than those without (median survival time, 146 versus 69 days; P<0.0001). Although age, presence of ascites, laboratory values and types of prior anticancer therapy were not significantly different, a longer interval from last anticancer therapy to diagnosis of MBO was observed in patients who underwent surgery compared with those who did not (median, 57 versus 30 days; P<0.05), as well as superior performance status. Among the patients with surgery, the interval was also longer in patients with successful palliation compared with those without (median, 83 versus 32 days; P<0.05). The palliative benefit of surgery for MBO in selected patients with gynecological malignancy was observed. The interval from last anticancer therapy to diagnosis of MBO may serve as a prognostic factor when considering surgical intervention.

Identifiers

PMID23162616
PMCPMC3499592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.