Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23161897›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2012

African ancestry and genetic risk for uterine leiomyomata.

Lauren A Wise, Edward A Ruiz-Narvaez, Julie R Palmer, Yvette C Cozier, Arti Tandon, Nick Patterson, Rose G Radin, Lynn Rosenberg, David Reich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Genetic Variation and Hot Flashes: A Systematic Review.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The associations between the polymorphisms of the ER-α gene and the risk of uterine leiomyoma (ULM).Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of uterine fibroids.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  7. UTERINE FIBROIDS.Physiological reviews · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Molecular and Cellular Insights into the Development of Uterine Fibroids.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lauren A WiseSlone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, 1010 Commonwealth Avenue, 4th Floor, Boston, MA 02215, USA. lwise@bu.edu
Edward A Ruiz-Narvaez
Julie R Palmer
Yvette C Cozier
Arti Tandon
Nick Patterson
Rose G Radin
Lynn Rosenberg
David Reich

Funding

FOLLOW-UP STUDY FOR CAUSES OF ILLNESS IN BLACK WOMENR01CA058420 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI ROSENBERG, LYNN · 1999 to 2013
$20.7M
A Follow-up Study for Causes of Cancer in Black WomenUM1CA164974 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI ROSENBERG, LYNN · 2012 to 2017
$13.7M
Gene Polymorphisms in Relation to Cancer in Black WomenR01CA098663 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI PALMER, JULIE R · 2003 to 2012
$5.3M
BURPPE:BU Reproductive, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology Training ProgramT32HD052458 · NICHD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI WERLER, MARTHA M. · 2007 to 2016
$2.0M
Genetic Admixture Study of Uterine Fibroids in African American WomenR01HD057966 · NICHD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI WISE, LAUREN A · 2009 to 2012
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA058420NCI NIH HHS R01CA058420NCI NIH HHS R01 CA098663NCI NIH HHS R01CA098663NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA164974NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD057966NICHD NIH HHS R01HD057966NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD052458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rates of uterine leiomyomata (UL) are 2-3 times higher in African Americans than in European Americans. It is unclear whether inherited factors explain the ethnic disparity. To investigate the presence of risk alleles for UL that are highly differentiated in frequency between African Americans and European Americans, the authors conducted an admixture-based genome-wide scan of 2,453 UL cases confirmed by ultrasound or surgery in the Black Women's Health Study (1997-2009), a national prospective cohort study. Controls (n = 2,102) were women who did not report a UL diagnosis through 2009. Mean percentage of European ancestry was significantly lower among cases (20.00%) than among controls (21.63%; age-adjusted mean difference = -1.76%, 95% confidence interval: -2.40, -1.12; P < 0.0001), and the association was stronger in younger cases. Admixture analyses showed suggestive evidence of association at chromosomes 2, 4, and 10. The authors also genotyped a dense set of tag single nucleotide polymorphisms at different loci associated with UL in Japanese women but failed to replicate the associations. This suggests that genetic variation for UL differs in populations with and without African ancestry. The admixture findings further indicate that no single highly differentiated locus is responsible for the ethnic disparity in UL, raising the possibility that multiple variants jointly contribute to the higher incidence of UL in African Americans.

Indexed as

AdultAsian PeopleBlack or African AmericanCase-Control StudiesFemaleGenetic LoadGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyHealth Status DisparitiesHumansJapanLeiomyomaMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePremenopauseProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID23161897
PMCPMC3571235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.