Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23161673›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2013

Identifying protein interaction subnetworks by a bagging Markov random field-based method.

Li Chen, Jianhua Xuan, Rebecca B Riggins, Yue Wang, Robert Clarke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Detecting subnetwork-level dynamic correlations.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Proteomics for systems toxicology.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Li ChenDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Arlington, VA 22203, USA.
Jianhua Xuan
Rebecca B Riggins
Yue Wang
Robert Clarke

Funding

Novel Targets in Endocrine ResponsivenessU54CA149147 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MADHAVAN, SUBHA · 2010 to 2014
$6.9M
Improved Diagnostic of the Muscular DystrophiesR01NS029525 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HOFFMAN, ERIC P. · 1991 to 2015
$6.5M
Uncovering Estrogen Receptor-Signaling Networks to Overcome Endocrine ResistanceR01CA149653 · NCI · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI XUAN, JASON JIANHUA · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
Network-based Prediction of Antiestrogen Resistance in Breast CancerR21CA139246 · NCI · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI XUAN, JASON JIANHUA · 2009 to 2010
$381k
NCI NIH HHS CA139246NCI NIH HHS CA149147NCI NIH HHS CA149653NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149653NCI NIH HHS R21 CA139246NINDS NIH HHS NS29525-18ANINDS NIH HHS R01 NS029525PHS HHS HHSN2612200800001E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of differentially expressed subnetworks from protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks has become increasingly important to our global understanding of the molecular mechanisms that drive cancer. Several methods have been proposed for PPI subnetwork identification, but the dependency among network member genes is not explicitly considered, leaving many important hub genes largely unidentified. We present a new method, based on a bagging Markov random field (BMRF) framework, to improve subnetwork identification for mechanistic studies of breast cancer. The method follows a maximum a posteriori principle to form a novel network score that explicitly considers pairwise gene interactions in PPI networks, and it searches for subnetworks with maximal network scores. To improve their robustness across data sets, a bagging scheme based on bootstrapping samples is implemented to statistically select high confidence subnetworks. We first compared the BMRF-based method with existing methods on simulation data to demonstrate its improved performance. We then applied our method to breast cancer data to identify PPI subnetworks associated with breast cancer progression and/or tamoxifen resistance. The experimental results show that not only an improved prediction performance can be achieved by the BMRF approach when tested on independent data sets, but biologically meaningful subnetworks can also be revealed that are relevant to breast cancer and tamoxifen resistance.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMarkov ChainsProtein Interaction MappingProtein Interaction MapsTamoxifenAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID23161673
PMCPMC3553975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.