Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23161517›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2013

Incorporating network structure in integrative analysis of cancer prognosis data.

Jin Liu, Jian Huang, Shuangge Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Structured Analysis of the High-dimensional FMR Model.Computational statistics & data analysis · 2020
    Article
  5. GRIA: Graphical Regularization for Integrative Analysis.Proceedings of the ... SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. SIAM International Conference on Data Mining · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Integrative Analysis of "-Omics" Data Using Penalty Functions.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational statistics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jin LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Jian Huang
Shuangge Ma

Funding

Predicting Adjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Lung CancerR01CA152301 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI XIE, YANG · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
Novel Methods for Integrative Analysis of Cancer Genomic DataR01CA142774 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MA, SHUANGGE · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
Robust rank-based methods and detection of GXE in cancer etiology and survivalR21CA165923 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MA, SHUANGGE, ZHANG, YAWEI · 2012 to 2014
$421k
NCI NIH HHS CA142774NCI NIH HHS CA152301NCI NIH HHS CA165923NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142774NCI NIH HHS R01 CA152301NCI NIH HHS R21 CA165923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In high-throughput cancer genomic studies, markers identified from the analysis of single datasets may have unsatisfactory properties because of low sample sizes. Integrative analysis pools and analyzes raw data from multiple studies, and can effectively increase sample size and lead to improved marker identification results. In this study, we consider the integrative analysis of multiple high-throughput cancer prognosis studies. In the existing integrative analysis studies, the interplay among genes, which can be described using the network structure, has not been effectively accounted for. In network analysis, tightly connected nodes (genes) are more likely to have related biological functions and similar regression coefficients. The goal of this study is to develop an analysis approach that can incorporate the gene network structure in integrative analysis. To this end, we adopt an AFT (accelerated failure time) model to describe survival. A weighted least squares approach, which has low computational cost, is adopted for estimation. For marker selection, we propose a new penalization approach. The proposed penalty is composed of two parts. The first part is a group MCP penalty, and conducts gene selection. The second part is a Laplacian penalty, and smoothes the differences of coefficients for tightly connected genes. A group coordinate descent approach is developed to compute the proposed estimate. Simulation study shows satisfactory performance of the proposed approach when there exist moderate-to-strong correlations among genes. We analyze three lung cancer prognosis datasets, and demonstrate that incorporating the network structure can lead to the identification of important genes and improved prediction performance.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksModels, TheoreticalComputer SimulationHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansLung NeoplasmsNeoplasmsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID23161517
PMCPMC3909475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.