Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23161490›Full record

ArticleCancer research2013

Augmenting antitumor T-cell responses to mimotope vaccination by boosting with native tumor antigens.

Jonathan D Buhrman, Kimberly R Jordan, Lance U'ren, Jonathan Sprague, Charles B Kemmler, Jill E Slansky

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Targeting Angiogenesis With Peptide Vaccines.Frontiers in immunology · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Microbial HSP70 peptide epitope 407-426 as adjuvant in tumor-derived autophagosome vaccine therapy of mouse lung cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan D BuhrmanIntegrated Department of Immunology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO 80206, USA.
Kimberly R Jordan
Lance U'ren
Jonathan Sprague
Charles B Kemmler
Jill E Slansky
University of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

University of Colorado Cancer Center Support Grant - Lung Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts with Autologous Human Immune SystemsP30CA046934 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI James V Degregori · 1988 to 2026
$117.0M
Mouses Model for Ag.Specific Immunotherapy of CancerR01CA109560 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SLANSKY, JILL E · 2004 to 2008
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA109560NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046934NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination with antigens expressed by tumors is one strategy for stimulating enhanced T-cell responses against tumors. However, these peptide vaccines rarely result in efficient expansion of tumor-specific T cells or responses that protect against tumor growth. Mimotopes, or peptide mimics of tumor antigens, elicit increased numbers of T cells that crossreact with the native tumor antigen, resulting in potent antitumor responses. Unfortunately, mimotopes may also elicit cells that do not crossreact or have low affinity for tumor antigen. We previously showed that one such mimotope of the dominant MHC class I tumor antigen of a mouse colon carcinoma cell line stimulates a tumor-specific T-cell clone and elicits antigen-specific cells in vivo, yet protects poorly against tumor growth. We hypothesized that boosting the mimotope vaccine with the native tumor antigen would focus the T-cell response elicited by the mimotope toward high affinity, tumor-specific T cells. We show that priming T cells with the mimotope, followed by a native tumor-antigen boost, improves tumor immunity compared with T cells elicited by the same prime with a mimotope boost. Our data suggest that the improved tumor immunity results from the expansion of mimotope-elicited tumor-specific T cells that have increased avidity for the tumor antigen. The enhanced T cells are phenotypically distinct and enriched for T-cell receptors previously correlated with improved antitumor immunity. These results suggest that incorporation of native antigen into clinical mimotope vaccine regimens may improve the efficacy of antitumor T-cell responses.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesCross ReactionsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEpitopes, T-LymphocyteFemaleLymphocyte ActivationMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNeoplasmsT-LymphocytesAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesEpitopes, T-Lymphocyte

Identifiers

PMID23161490
PMCPMC3537842
OpenAlexW2125030800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.