Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23161373›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2013

Ecological risk assessment in the context of global climate change.

Wayne G Landis, Judi L Durda, Marjorie L Brooks, Peter M Chapman, Charles A Menzie, Ralph G Stahl, Jennifer L Stauber

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Increased Use of Bayesian Network Models Has Improved Environmental Risk Assessments.Integrated environmental assessment and management · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Environmental Goals Addressed in Assessments of Contaminated Sediments.Integrated environmental assessment and management · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Integrating Public Health into Climate Change Policy and Planning: State of Practice Update.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Wayne G LandisWestern Washington University, Institute of Environmental Toxicology, Bellingham, WA, USA. wayne.landis@wwu.edu
Judi L Durda
Marjorie L Brooks
Peter M Chapman
Charles A Menzie
Ralph G Stahl
Jennifer L Stauber
CSIRO Land and Water · AUExponent (United States) · USGolder Associates (Canada) · CAIntegral Consulting (United States) · USSouthern Illinois University Carbondale · USWestern Washington University · USWilmington University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes to sources, stressors, habitats, and geographic ranges; toxicological effects; end points; and uncertainty estimation require significant changes in the implementation of ecological risk assessment (ERA). Because of the lack of analog systems and circumstances in historically studied sites, there is a likelihood of type III error. As a first step, the authors propose a decision key to aid managers and risk assessors in determining when and to what extent climate change should be incorporated. Next, when global climate change is an important factor, the authors recommend seven critical changes to ERA. First, develop conceptual cause-effect diagrams that consider relevant management decisions as well as appropriate spatial and temporal scales to include both direct and indirect effects of climate change and the stressor of management interest. Second, develop assessment end points that are expressed as ecosystem services. Third, evaluate multiple stressors and nonlinear responses-include the chemicals and the stressors related to climate change. Fourth, estimate how climate change will affect or modify management options as the impacts become manifest. Fifth, consider the direction and rate of change relative to management objectives, recognizing that both positive and negative outcomes can occur. Sixth, determine the major drivers of uncertainty, estimating and bounding stochastic uncertainty spatially, temporally, and progressively. Seventh, plan for adaptive management to account for changing environmental conditions and consequent changes to ecosystem services. Good communication is essential for making risk-related information understandable and useful for managers and stakeholders to implement a successful risk-assessment and decision-making process.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeClimateEcologyEcosystemEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutantsHumansRisk AssessmentStress, PhysiologicalEnvironmental Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID23161373
PMCPMC3601429
OpenAlexW2038144827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.