Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23161369›Full record

ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2013

Interspecific effects of 4A-DNT (4-amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene) and RDX (1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine) in Japanese quail, Northern bobwhite, and Zebra finch.

Michael J Quinn, Terry L Hanna, Alicia A Shiflett, Craig A McFarland, Michelle E Cook, Mark S Johnson, Kurt A Gust, Edward J Perkins

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The seizure-inducing plastic explosive RDX inhibits the α1β2γ2 GABAAnnals of clinical and translational neurology · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Michael J QuinnUS Army Public Health Command, Toxicology Portfolio, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010, USA. michael.james.quinn@us.army.mil
Terry L Hanna
Alicia A Shiflett
Craig A McFarland
Michelle E Cook
Mark S Johnson
Kurt A Gust
Edward J Perkins
Defense Center for Public Health - AberdeenUnited States Army Corps of Engineers · USUnited States Army Medical Command · USOak Ridge Associated Universities · USU.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the toxicological effects of two munition compounds, 4-amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene (4A-DNT) and 1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX), on three different bird species: two common toxicological model species-the Northern Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) and the Japanese Quail (Coturnix japonica), and a representative passerine-the Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Bobwhite were exposed to 4A-DNT at 0, 8, 15, 30, 60, or 150 mg/kg body weight (bw) d by oral gavage for seven days; because the high dose of 4A-DNT was lethal to bobwhite, the maximum dose was changed to 100 mg/kg bw d for Japanese quail and finches to ensure tissue could be used for future toxicogenomic work. RDX was similarly administered at 0, 0.5, 1.5, 3, 6, or 12 mg/kg bw d. Blood was drawn prior to euthanasia for blood cellularity and chemistry analyses. Finches were clearly least affected by 4A-DNT as evidenced by a lack of observable effects. Bobwhite appeared to be the most sensitive species to 4A-DNT as observed through changes in blood cellularity and plasma chemistry effects. Bobwhite appeared to be more sensitive to RDX than Japanese Quail due to increased effects on measures of plasma chemistries. Finches exhibited the greatest sensitivity to RDX through increased mortality and seizure activity. This study suggests that sensitivity among species is chemical-specific and provides data that could be used to refine current avian sensitivity models used in ecological risk assessments.

Indexed as

ColinusCoturnixFinchesAniline CompoundsAnimalsBiomarkersBody WeightDose-Response Relationship, DrugEnvironmental MonitoringExplosive AgentsPopulation DensityRisk AssessmentSeizuresSpecies SpecificityTime FactorsToxicity Tests4-amino-2,6-dinitrotolueneAniline CompoundsBiomarkerscycloniteExplosive AgentsTriazines

Identifiers

PMID23161369
OpenAlexW2078048215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.