ArticleExperimental brain research2013
Role of pattern, regularity, and silent intervals in auditory stream segregation based on inter-aural time differences.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuronal Correlates of Auditory Streaming in Monkey Auditory Cortex for Tone Sequences without Spectral Differences.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2018Article
- Emergence of Spatial Stream Segregation in the Ascending Auditory Pathway.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015Article
- Article
- Predictability effects in auditory scene analysis: a review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2014Review
- Perceptual organization of auditory streaming-task relies on neural entrainment of the stimulus-presentation rate: MEG evidence.BMC neuroscience · 2013Article
- Spatial stream segregation by auditory cortical neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tone triplets separated by a pause (ABA_) are a popular tone-repetition pattern to study auditory stream segregation. Such triplets produce a galloping rhythm when integrated, but isochronous rhythms when segregated. Other patterns lacking a pause may produce less-prominent rhythmic differences but stronger streaming. Here, we evaluated whether this difference is readily explained by the presence of the pause and potentially associated with the reduction of adaptation, or whether there is contribution of tone pattern per se. Sequences with repetitive ABA_ and ABAA patterns were presented in magnetoencephalography. A and B tones were separated by differences in inter-aural time differences (ΔITD). Results showed that the stronger streaming of ABAA was associated with a more prominent release from the adaptation of the P(1)m in auditory cortex. We further compared behavioral streaming responses for patterns with and without pauses, and varied the position of the pause and pattern regularity. Results showed a major effect of the pauses' presence, but no prominent effects of tone pattern or pattern regularity. These results make a case for the existence of an early, primitive streaming mechanism that does not require an analysis of the tone pattern at later stages suggested by predictive-coding models of auditory streaming. The results are better explained by the simpler population-separation model and stress the previously observed role of neural adaptation for streaming perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23161159What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.